Cell Compatibility of the Micro-Arc Oxidized Surface of Large Plastic Deformed TA2 In Vitro

Abstract:

The cell toxicity, cell proliferation and cell adhesion behaviors on the micro-arc oxidized surface of the conventional and large plastic deformed pure titanium (TA2) were studied. The results show that all samples have no cell toxicity. The cell proliferation ability on the surface of the large plastic deformed pure titanium (TA2) is better than that of the conventional pure titanium (TA2). The numbers of cells adhered on micro-arc oxidized surface of the large plastic deformed of pure titanium (TA2) are more than that of conventional pure titanium (TA2). And the distribution of the cells and cell morphologies are better than that of the conventional pure titanium (TA2). Results all above show that structure refinement of large deformation of pure titanium (TA2) has more significant improvement on the cell compatibility of the micro-arc oxidized modified films.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 852)
• Pages: 1220-1226
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.852.1220
• Online since: April 2016
• Authors: Li Hua Zhu*, Xiao Jing Xu, Ting Zhuo Chen, Xiao Ya Niu, Lin Xu
• Keywords: Cell Adhesion, Cell Compatibility, Cell Proliferation, Cell Toxicity, Large Plastic Deformed Pure Titanium (TA2), Micro-Arc Oxidization (MAO)

References

[1] Huang Y G: Titanium Industry Progress. 2002, 2: 13-16.

[2] Geetha M, Singh A K, Asokamani R, et al: Progress in Materials Science. 2009, 54(3): 397-425.

[3] Rack H J, Qazi J I: Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2006, 26(8): 1269-1277.

[4] Xu X J, Shao H H, Gao J C, et al: Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2008, 493(1-2): 195-201.

[5] Yuri E, I E P, M A, et al: Acta Biomaterialia. 2011, 7(2): 900-906.

[6] Park J W, Kim Y J, Park C H, et al: Acta Biomaterialia. 2009, 5(8): 3272-3280.

[7] Truong V K, Lapovok R, Estrin Y S, et al: Biomaterials. 2010, 31(13): 3674-3683.

[8] YU Chun-hang, SHAO Hong-hong, XU Xiao-jing, ZHAI Rui: Journal of Functional Materials. 2010, 41(5): 844-848.

[9] Shao H H, Yu C H, Xu X J, et al: Applied Surface Engineering. 2010, 257(5): 1649-1654.

[10] Yao Z Q, Ivanisenko Y, Diemant T, et al: Acta Biomaterialia. 2010, 6(7): 2816-2825.

[11] Zhu L H, Xu X J, Niu X Y, et al: Advanced Materials Research. 2014, 1053: 21-29.

[12] Armitage D A, Grant D M: Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2003, 349(1-2): 87-89.

[13] Thierry B, Tabrizian M, Trepanier C, et al: Biomed Mater Res. 2000, 51(5): 685-693.

[14] Oberdörster G: J Intern Med. 2010; 267(1): 89-105.

[15] Boverhof DR, David RM: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010; 396(3): 953-61.

[16] Ray PC, Yu H, Fu PP: Toxicity and environmental risks of nanomaterials: challenges and future needs. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2009; 27(1): 1-35.

[17] McNeil SE: Bull At Sci. 2009; 65(1): 56-61.

[18] Evaluation of Biology Based on Medical Devices. China Food and Drug Administration. GB/T_168.

[19] Valiev R Z, Langdon T G: Prog Mater Sci, 2006, 51(7): 881.