Evaluations of Stochastic Fatigue Crack Growth Models through Experimental Data

C.C. Ni

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.878.132

Paper Titles

Characterisation of Silicon Carbide from Dark Red Meranti Wood
p.108

Effect of Groove Geometry on Rolling Contact Fatigue of PEEK Thrust Bearings in Water
p.117

Investigation on Strength Model of Metal Plastic Deformation under High Strain Rate
p.122

Measurement Methods of Friction Coefficient for Plastic Deformation of Metals under High Strain Rate
p.127

Evaluations of Stochastic Fatigue Crack Growth Models through Experimental Data
p.132

Observation of Fatigue Fracture on PEEK Shaft against Alumina Bearing’s Ball under One-Point Rolling Contact
p.137

Evaluation of Tribological Thermal Failure on PEEK-PTFE Hybrid Alumina Ball Bearings
p.142

Study on Friction of Bearing Cable and Saddle with Different Material in Freight Ropeways
p.148

Influence of Autogenous Shrinkage and early Anti-Cracking Behavior of USHC with Pretreatment RHA
p.155

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 878Evaluations of Stochastic Fatigue Crack Growth...

Evaluations of Stochastic Fatigue Crack Growth Models through Experimental Data

Abstract:

The study is focused on the comparisons between a polynomial and power-law stochastic fatigue crack growth models through evaluations of experimental data. Both models were assumed that the fatigue crack growth rate equals to a deterministic function in terms of fatigue crack size multiplied by a stationary log-normal random factor. Compact-tension specimens cut from a 2024-T351 aluminum-alloy plate were used for fatigue crack growth experiments under random loads performed on twenty-five specimens. The log-normal probability papers for both models were investigated to show the validity of the log-normal assumption of the random factor . The investigations on the probability of crack exceedance and distribution of random time of the two models were also made, and the comparisons of the results for both models were made as well.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Materials Design and Mechanics IV

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 878)

Pages:

132-136

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.878.132

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2016

Authors:

C.C. Ni*

Keywords:

Compact-Tension Specimen, Fatigue Experiment, Stochastic Fatigue Crack Growth

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] P.C. Paris, F. Erdogan, A Critical Analysis of Propagation Laws, Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of ASME, Vol. 85 (1963), pp.528-534.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3656902

Google Scholar

[2] W. Elber, The Stress Ratio Effect on Fatigue Crack Closure, Damage Tolerance of Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1971).

Google Scholar

[3] J.N. Yang, S.D. Manning, and W.R. Garver, Durability Methods Development, Volume V-Durability Analysis Methodology Development, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-79-3118, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (1979).

Google Scholar

[4] C.C. Ni, Formulation of a Polynomial Stochastic Fatigue Crack Growth Model, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 909 (2014), pp.467-471.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.909.467

Google Scholar

[5] A.B. Lidiard, Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics, in Fracture Mechanics-Current Status, Future Prospects, Pergamon Press (1979), p.149.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-024766-3.50010-0

Google Scholar

[6] K.M. Engesvik, Analysis of Uncertainties in the Fatigue Capacity of Welded Joints Report UR-82-17, Division of Marine Structure, Trondheim, Norway (1981).

Google Scholar

[7] H. Itagaki, M. Shinozuka, Application of the Monte Carlo Technique to Fatigue-Failure Analysis under Random Loading, Probabilistic Aspects of Fatigue, ASTM STP 511 (1972), pp.168-184.

DOI: 10.1520/stp35409s

Google Scholar

[8] Y.K. Lin, J.N. Yang, On Statistical Moments of Fatigue Crack Propagation, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 18 (1983), pp.243-256.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(83)90136-4

Google Scholar

[9] ASTM E647-91, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, American Society for Testing and Materials, Vol. 03. 01 (1991), pp.679-706.

Google Scholar