Influence of Coiling on Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Strip-Cast Low-Carbon Low-Niobium Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

As-cast low-carbon low-niobium steels fabricated by direct strip casting (DSC) were treated by simulated coiling in the lab. Coiling temperatures were carefully selected: (1) 900 ̊C (in the austenite); (2) 700 ̊C (during the austenite-to-ferrite transformation); (3) 650 ̊C (in the ferrite). Optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy were used to examine the microstructure constituents and the precipitates. Mechanical properties were evaluated by Vickers macrohardness measurements. The results show that coiling treatment has a strong influence on the final microstructure and mechanical properties, thus highlighting the necessity to carefully design the coiling treatment. In addition, the differences in hardness for the three coiling temperatures derive from a complex combination of different strengthening mechanisms.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1182-1187

Citation:

Online since:

November 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Kopp, F. Hagemann, L. Hentschel, J. Schmitz, D. Senk, Thin-strip casting—modelling of the combined casting/metal-forming process , Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 80 (1998) 458-462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(98)00199-x

Google Scholar

[2] N. Zapuskalov, Comparison of continuous strip casting with conventional technology, ISIJ international, 43 (2003) 1115-1127.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.43.1115

Google Scholar

[3] M. Ferry, Direct strip casting of metals and alloys, Woodhead Publishing, (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Funakawa, T. Shiozaki, K. Tomita, T. Yamamoto, E. Maeda, Development of high strength hot-rolled sheet steel consisting of ferrite and nanometer-sized carbides, ISIJ international, 44 (2004) 1945-(1951).

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.44.1945

Google Scholar

[5] R. Misra, H. Nathani, J. Hartmann, F. Siciliano, Microstructural evolution in a new 770MPa hot rolled Nb–Ti microalloyed steel, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 394 (2005) 339-352.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.11.041

Google Scholar

[6] T. Dorin, N. Stanford, A. Taylor, P. Hodgson, Effect of Cooling Rate on Phase Transformations in a High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Studied from the Liquid Phase, Metall and Mat Trans A, 46 (2015) 5561-5571.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-015-3173-0

Google Scholar

[7] Q. Yong, Secondary phases in steels, Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] J.H. Jang, Y. -U. Heo, C. -H. Lee, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, D. -W. Suh, Interphase precipitation in Ti–Nb and Ti–Nb–Mo bearing steel, Materials Science and Technology, 29 (2013) 309-313.

DOI: 10.1179/1743284712y.0000000131

Google Scholar

[9] J.J. Hoyt, The velocity of plate precipitates growing by the ledge mechanism, Acta Materialia, 61 (2013) 4953-4960.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.051

Google Scholar

[10] F.B. Pickering, Physical metallurgy and the design of steels, Applied Science Publishers, (1978).

Google Scholar

[11] H. -J. Kestenbach, S. Campos, E. Morales, Role of interphase precipitation in microalloyed hot strip steels, Materials science and technology, 22 (2006) 615-626.

DOI: 10.1179/026708306x81487

Google Scholar

[12] J.T. Busby, M.C. Hash, G.S. Was, The relationship between hardness and yield stress in irradiated austenitic and ferritic steels, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 336 (2005) 267-278.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.09.024

Google Scholar

[13] E.J. Pavlina, C.J. Van Tyne, Correlation of yield strength and tensile strength with hardness for steels, J. of Materi Eng and Perform, 17 (2008) 888-893.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-008-9225-5

Google Scholar

[14] A. E-112, Standard test methods for determining average grain size, ASTM International USA, (2010).

Google Scholar