Implementation of Cast Steel Nodes by Considering of CTOD Value

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cast steel nodes are being increasingly popular in steel structure joint application. Cast steel node joint consists of two parts: casting itself and the welds between the node and the steel member. The fatigue resistances of these two parts are very different. This paper presents a using of the MSF (Main Structure Farm) casting nodes S420 instead of carbon steel plate by considering the Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) value and the percentage of coarse grain. The sampling work piece from the weld and heat affected zone (HAZ) were tested and compared the CTOD value and mechanical properties to the standard. This result shows that the CTOD values are under allowable value. After that, a finite element (FEM) program was corporately used to simulate. It is acceptable cast node even the CTOD is undesirable. The benefit of the paper is to show the procedure to prove cast steel nodes by using CTOD.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

87-91

Citation:

Online since:

January 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.C. Haldimann-Sturm, A. Nussbaumer, International Journal of Fatigue, 30, (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] Libin Wang, Hui Jin, Haiwei Dong and Jing Li, Balance Fatigue Design of Cast Steel Nodes in Tubular Steel Structures, The scientific Word Journal, Volume, (2013).

DOI: 10.1155/2013/421410

Google Scholar

[3] R. Puthli, High strength steel and cast steel nodes for tubular structure-investigate, application and research result, Research Centre for steel, Timber & masonry, (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] M-122 Cast structural steel, Rev. 2, October, (2012).

Google Scholar

[5] ISO 12135, Metallic materials Unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness, (2002).

Google Scholar

[6] Tetsuya T., Yoichi K. i, Engineering Fracture Mechanics Journal, 77, (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] T. Tagawa, Y. Kayamori, , Welding the world , Vol. 54, (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] NORSOK M-101 Structural steel fabrication, Rev. 5, October, ( 2011).

Google Scholar

[9] ISO 15614-1, Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic Part 1: Arc and gas welding of steels and arc welding of nickel and nickel alloys., (2004).

DOI: 10.3403/03062226

Google Scholar

[10] ISO 15653, Metallic materials Method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness of welds, (2010).

DOI: 10.3403/30157169

Google Scholar

[11] ISO 12737, Metallic materials Determination of plane-strain fracture toughness. ( 2010).

Google Scholar

[12] EN 10225 Weldable structural steels for fixed offshore structures – Technical delivery conditions, (2009).

DOI: 10.3403/02338491

Google Scholar