NbN Thin Film of Alternating Textures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The δ-NbN thin films with different thickness have been prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering at different deposition time and exhibited alternating textures between (111) and (200) orientations as a function of thickness. In addition, the grain size, peak position, morphology, residual stress and orientation distributions of the deposited films were explored by X-ray diffraction, low-angel X-ray reflectivity, scanning electron microscopy and surface profiler. The film deposited at 300 s showed a (111) preferred orientation, changing to (200) preferred orientation at 600 s, and exhibited alternating textures between (111) and (200) preferred orientations. With further increasing deposition time, in which (200) peak position and the full width at half maximum of (111) peak also displayed a trend of alternating variation with varying deposition time. The intrinsic stress for δ-NbN films calculated by Stoney equation alternately changed with alternating textures, in which (111) orientation always takes place at relatively high intrinsic stress state and vice versa. Meanwhile, the film with (111) preferred orientation showed higher density than (200) preferred orientation. The film deposited at 4800 s owned a mixed texture of (111) and (200), showing an anisotropy distribution of (111)-oriented and (200)-oriented grains, while film deposited at 7200 s owned a strong (200) texture, displaying an isotropy distribution of (200)-oriented grains. The competitive growth between (111)-oriented and (200)-oriented grains was responsibility for alternating texture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1431-1437

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K.S. Keskar, T. Yamashita, Y. Onodera, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 10 (1971) 370-374.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Gotoh, M. Nagao, T. Ura, H. Tsuji, J. Ishikawa, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 148 (1999) 925-929.

Google Scholar

[3] M.S. Wong, W.D. Sproul, X. Chu, S.A. Barnett, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11 (1993) 1528-1533.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Cansever, M. Danιsman, K. Kazmanlι, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2008) 5919-5923.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Wen, C.Q. Hu, Q.N. Meng, Z.D. Zhao, T. An, Y.D. Su, W.X. Yu, W.T. Zheng, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 035304.

Google Scholar

[6] Z.B. Qi, Z.T. Wu, D.F. Zhang, J. Zuo, Z.C. Wang, Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 675 (2016) 22-30.

Google Scholar

[7] Alexander D. Pogrebnjak, Oleksandr V. Bondar, Gregory Abadias, Volodymyr Ivashchenko, Oleg V. Sobol, Stefan Jurga, Emerson Coy, Ceramics International. 42 (2016) 11743–11756.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.095

Google Scholar

[8] N.N. Iosad, N.M. Van der Pers, S. Grachev, V.V. Roddatis, B.D. Jackson, S.N. Polyakov, P.N. Dmitriev, and T.M. Klapwijk, Journal of Applied Physics. 92 (2002) 4999-5005.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1510589

Google Scholar

[9] H.Y. Liu, X.M. Ma, W.Z. Shi. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 19 (2005) 1775.

Google Scholar

[10] H.C. Huang, H. L. Wei, C. H. Woo, X. X. Zhang, Applied Physics Letters. 82 (2003) 4265-4267.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Wen, H. Huang, K. Zhang, Q.N. Meng, X. Li, L.W. Kong, C.Q. Hu, W.T. Zheng, Surf. Coat. Technol. 235 (2013) 367–375.

Google Scholar

[12] I. Petrov, P. B. Barna, L. Hultman, J. E. Greene, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 21 (2003) 117-128.

Google Scholar