One-Step FSP Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Fe/Al2O3 and Fe-Ce/Al2O3 Catalyst for CO2 Hydrogenation Reaction

Kanyarat Piriyasurawong; Sunthon Piticharoenphun; Okorn Mekasuwandumrong

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.916.134

Paper Titles

Production of Biomass Fiber Packaging Material by Microwave Foaming Method
p.115

Adsorption of Methylene Blue (MB) Dye in Wastewater by Electrospun Polysulfone (PSF)/Organo-Montmorillonite (O-MMT) Nanostructured Membrane
p.120

Fabrication and Characterization of Electrospun Polysulfone (PSF)/Organo-Montmorillonite (O-MMT) Nanostructured Membranes
p.125

Synthesis, Short-Range Structure and Hydration Processes of Oxyhalides Ba₂InO₃X (X = F, Cl, Br) with Ruddlesden-Popper Structure
p.130

One-Step FSP Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Fe/Al₂O₃ and Fe-Ce/Al₂O₃ Catalyst for CO₂ Hydrogenation Reaction
p.134

Synthesis and Characterization of Cu/ZnO Catalyst on Carbon Nanotubes and Al₂O₃ Supports
p.139

Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds (Monocaprin and Monolaurin) into Polymeric Nanoparticles
p.147

Neural Network as an Assisting Tool in Designing Talus Implant
p.153

Development of Mesoporous Magnetic Hydroxyapatite Nanocrystals
p.161

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 916One-Step FSP Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Fe/Al2O3...

One-Step FSP Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Fe/Al₂O₃ and Fe-Ce/Al₂O₃ Catalyst for CO₂ Hydrogenation Reaction

Abstract:

Nanocrystalline Fe/Al₂O₃ and Fe-Ce/Al₂O₃ catalysts doped with various amounts of cerium were prepared using the one-step flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) technique. The characterization of the catalysts was measured by several methods such as X-ray diffraction, nitrogen physisorption and hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H₂-TPR) techniques. The results revealed that the FSP-made catalyst exhibited the characteristic pattern of FeAl₂O₄ phase without any phases of aluminum or iron oxide. In addition, cerium (Ce) dopant did not alter crystal structure at low content. However, 7 wt% content of cerium dopant resulted in the formation of ceria (CeO) and iron oxide (Fe₂O₃) phase. The catalytic performance of the FSP-made catalyst was tested in carbon dioxide hydrogenation for selective production of long chain hydrocarbon, and was compared to conventional impregnation-made catalysts. In the comparison, the FSP-made catalyst exhibited lower catalytic activity but possessed a higher long chain hydrocarbon selectivity. After doping with Ce, the catalytic activity was improved while the hydrocarbon selectivity was decreased and shifted to the short chain hydrocarbon product. In the case of conventional-made catalysts, the activity remained unchanged but the hydrocarbon selectivity was decreased. Among all catalysts, the FSP-made Fe-Ce/Al₂O₃ catalyst with 3% Ce-promoted catalyst exhibited the best performance in terms of selectivity to long chain hydrocarbon.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Nano Engineering and Materials Technologies II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 916)

Pages:

134-138

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.916.134

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2018

Authors:

Kanyarat Piriyasurawong, Sunthon Piticharoenphun, Okorn Mekasuwandumrong*

Keywords:

Ce-Promoter, CO₂ Hydrogenation, Fe-Ce/Al₂O₃ Catalyst, Higher Hydrocarbon

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] J.A. XuMoulijn: Energy Fuels Vol. 10 (1996), p.305.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Mikkelsen, M. Jorgensen, F.C. Krebs: Energy Environ. Sci. Vol. 3 (2010), p.43.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Yang, Z. Xu, M. Fan, R. Gupta, R.B. Slimane, A.E. Bland, et al.: Environ. Sci. Vol. 20(2008), p.14.

Google Scholar

[4] S.K. Hoekman, A. Broch, C. Robbins, R. Purcell, Int.: Greenhouse Gas Control Vol. 4(2010), p.44.

Google Scholar

[5] W.Y. Teoh, R. Amal, L. Mädler: Nano Vol. 2 (2010), p.1324.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Strobel, and S.E. Pratsinis: Mater. Chem. Vol. 17 (2007), p.4743.

Google Scholar

[7] I. Rossetti,A. Gallo, V. D. Santo, P. Claudia L. Bianchi, V. Nichele, M. Signoretto, E. Finocchio,G. Ramis, Alessandro Di MicheleVol. 5 (2013), p.294.

Google Scholar

[8] I. Rossetti, G.F. Mancini, P. Ghigna, M. Scavini, M. Piumetti, B. Bonelli, F. Cavani, A. Comite: Physical Chemistry C Vol. 116 (2012), p.22386.

DOI: 10.1021/jp307031b

Google Scholar

[9] W.D. Robert, R.H. Dennis, W.W. Frederick, D.W. Heather: Catalysis Communications Vol. 15 (2011), p.88.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Ali1, N.A.M. Zabidi and D. Subbarao: Chemistry CentralVol. (2011), p.1.

Google Scholar