Solidification Chronology of the Metal Matrix and a Study of Conditions for Micropore Formation in Cast Irons Using EPMA and FTA

Article Preview

Abstract:

Microsegregation is intimately coupled with solidification, the development of microstructure, and involved in the formation of various casting defects. This paper demonstrates how the local composition of the metal matrix of graphitic cast irons, measured using quantitative electron microprobe analysis, can be used to determine its solidification chronology. The method is applied in combination with Fourier thermal analysis to investigate the formation of micropores in cast irons with varying proportions of compacted and spheroidal graphite produced by remelting. The results indicate that micropores formed at mass fractions of solid between 0.77 and 0.91, which corresponded to a stage of solidification when the temperature decline of the castings was large and increasing. In 4 out of the 5 castings, pores appear to have formed soon after the rate of solidification and heat dissipation had reached their maximum and were decreasing. While the freezing point depression due to build-up of microsegregation and the transition from compacted to spheroidal type growth of the eutectic both influencing solidification kinetics and the temperature evolution of the casting, the results did not indicate a clear relation to the observed late deceleration of solidification.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

436-443

Citation:

Online since:

June 2018

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Fredriksson, U. Åkerlind, Mat. Proc. during casting. Vol. 210. Wiley Online Library. (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] D. Stefanescu, Sci. and Eng. of casting solidification, third ed.: Springer. (2015).

Google Scholar

[3] G. Alonso, D. Stefanescu, R. Suarez, Int Foundry Res, 66 (2014) 2-12.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Campbell, Chapter 7: Porosity, in Complete Casting Handbook, Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford. 2011, 391-464.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Fredriksson, J. Stjerndahl, and J. Tinoco, Mat. Sci. and Eng. A-Struct, 413 (2005) 363-372.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Diószegi, L. Elmquist, and S. Adolfsson, AFS Trans., 105 (2008) 691-703.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Elmquist and A. Diószegi, Mat. Sci. Forum, 649 (2010) 443-448.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Elmquist, K. Soivio, and A. Diószegi, Mat. Sci. Forum. 2014. Trans Tech Publ.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Powell, The British Foundryman, 77 (1984) 472-483.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Lora, A. Diószegi, and L. Elmquist, Key Eng. Mat., 457 (2011) 108-113.

Google Scholar

[11] J. Hernando, B. Domeij, D. González, J. M. Amieva, A. Diószegi, Metall. Mater Trans. A 48 (2017) 5432-5441.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-017-4315-3

Google Scholar

[12] J.M. Motz, Practical Metallography, 25 (1988) 285-293.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Gungor, Metall. Trans. A, 20 (1989) 2529-2533.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Kagawa and T. Okamoto, J. of Mat. Sci., 19 (1984) 2307-2318.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Diószegi and J. Hattel, Int. J. of Cast Met. Res., 17 (2013) 311-318.

Google Scholar

[16] J.O. Andersson, et al., Calphad, 26 (2002) 273-312.

Google Scholar

[17] S., Subramanian. Physical Metall. of Cast Iron IV, (1989) 73-80.

Google Scholar

[18] E.N. Pan. K. Ogi, and C.R. Loper Jr., AFS Trans., 90 (1982) 509-527.

Google Scholar

[19] B. Domeij, A. Diószegi, (2017). Solidification Processing 2017 (SP17), Old Windsor, London, UK, BCAST, Brunel University London.

Google Scholar

[20] F. Mampaey. and Z.A. Xu, Cast Met., 7 (1994) 165-174.

Google Scholar