Influence of Strain Amplitude on the Functional Properties and Aging at Room Temperature of a Superelastic NiTi Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of strain amplitude variation on the functional properties of a superelastic NiTi wire were investigated in terms of critical stress to induce martensite, accumulated residual strain, dissipated energy, lower plateau stress, and stress at maximum strain. Wire specimens were subjected to training by pseudoelastic cycling, being mechanically strained up to strain amplitudes of 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14%. A total of 20 cycles were performed at each condition at room temperature and strain rate of 10-3s-1. In order to assess if the wires were able to maintain stable their functional properties after training, samples subjected to cycling at 8 and 14% strain amplitudes were aged at room temperature and retested. The results showed that the functional properties tend to stabilize faster when the alloy is subjected to lower strain amplitudes. It was observed that part of the functional properties was recovered if aged at room temperature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

380-385

Citation:

Online since:

September 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Otsuka, X. Ren: Prog. Mater. Sci. Vol. 50 (5) (2005), p.511.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Paradis, P. Terriault, V. Brailovski, V. Torra: Smart Mater. Struct. Vol. 13 (2008), p.1.

Google Scholar

[3] O. Benafan, R.D. Noebe, S.A. Padula II, D.W. Brown, S. Vogel, R. Vaidyanathan: Int. J. Plast. Vol. 56 (2014), p.99.

Google Scholar

[4] G.N. Dayananda, M.S. Rao: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 486 (2008), p.96.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Ma, I. Karaman, H.J. Maier, Y.I. Chumlyakov: Acta Mater. Vol. 58 (2010), p.2216.

Google Scholar

[6] X. Wang, J.V. Humbeeck, B. Verlinden, S. Kustov: Scr. Mater. Vol. 113 (2016), p.206.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Kustov, B. Mas, D. Salas, E. Cesari, S. Raufov, V. Nikolaev, J.V. Humbeeck: Scr. Mater. Vol. 103 (2015), p.10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.02.025

Google Scholar

[8] M.C.M. Rodrigues, G.C. Soares, L.A. Santos, V.T.L. Buono: Advances in Science and Technology Vol. 37 (2017), p.134.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Zurbitu, R. Santamarta, C. Picornell, W.M. Gan, H.G. Brokmeier, J. Aurrekoetxea: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 528 (2010), p.764.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.094

Google Scholar

[10] J.A. Shaw, S. Kyriakides: J. Mech. Phys. Solids Vol. 43 (8) (1995), p.1243.

Google Scholar

[11] E. Polatidis, N. Zotov, N. Bischoff, E.J. Mittemeijer: Scr. Mater. Vol. 100 (2015), p.59.

Google Scholar

[12] C.W. Chan, S.H.J. Chan, H.C. Man, P. Ji: Int. J. Plast. Vols. 32-33 (2012), p.85.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Frotscher, S. Wu, T. Simon, C. Somsen, A. Dlouhy, G. Eggeler: Adv. Eng. Mater. Vol. 13 (5) (2011), p.181.

Google Scholar

[14] C. Maletta, E. Sgambitterra, F. Furgiuele, R. Casati, A. Tuissi: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 66 (2014), p.78.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.011

Google Scholar