Magnetic Citric Acid-Modified Cellulose for the Removal of Copper Ions from Aqueous Solution

Article Preview

Abstract:

Magnetic citric acid-modified cellulose was successfully produced and tested for the removal of copper in aqueous solution. Initially, the cellulose material was reacted with citric acid solution. The modified cellulose was then attached to the Fe2O3 nanoparticle producing an adsorptive magnetic material. Characterization using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy indicated successful binding and chemical modification of the cellulose. Its adsorption was also studied to evaluate its potential in removing heavy metals such as copper. Removal of copper was as high as 84.74% in solution containing 25 mg/L copper. The sorption of copper in the magnetic sorbent follows second-order kinetics and best fits Freundlich isotherm model. The developed material has a strong magnetic response, thus its recovery in the aqueous solution could be easily facilitated using a magnetic field. Regeneration study indicated high recovery efficiency maintaining above 95.7% copper removal efficiency after three cycles of use. Thus, a highly efficient magnetic adsorptive material was produced using simple chemical modification aside from its easy recovery in the water.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

181-186

Citation:

Online since:

October 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Y. Zhu et al: Chem. Eng. J., Vol 173 (2011), pp.494-502.

Google Scholar

[2] D. W. O'Connell, C. Birkinshaw, and T. F. O'Dwyer: Bioresour. Technol., Vol 99 (2008), p.6709–6724.

Google Scholar

[3] X. Luo and L. Zhang: J. Hazard. Mater., Vol 171 (2009), p.340–347.

Google Scholar

[4] K. S. Low, C. K. Lee, and S. M. Mak: Wood Sci. Technol., Vol 38 (2004), p.629–640.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Saliba, H. Gauthier, and R. Gauthier: Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., Vol 23 (2005), p.313–322.

Google Scholar

[6] H.Y. Zhu, R. Jiang, L. Xiao, and G.M. Zeng: Bioresour. Technol., Vol 101 (2010), p.5063–5069.

Google Scholar

[7] S Hokkanen, E Repo, M Sillanpää: Chem. Eng. J., Vol 223 (2013), pp.40-47.

Google Scholar

[8] W. Dahou, D. Ghemati, A. Oudia, D. Aliouche: Biochem. Eng. J. Vol 48 (2010), pp.187-194.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2009.10.006

Google Scholar

[9] T.S. Anirudhan, S. Jalajamony, P.S. Suchihra: Colloids Surf. A: Phys., Eng. Aspects, Vol 335 (2009), pp.107-113.

Google Scholar

[10] A.M. Donia, A.A. Atia and F.I. Abouzayed: Chem. Eng. J., Vol 191 (2012), pp.22-30.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Fan, D. Dai and B. Huang, ch. 3 (2012).

Google Scholar

[12] J.A. Ramírez, E. Fortunati, J. M. Kenny, L. Torre and M.L. Foresti: Carbohydr. Polym., Vol 157 (2017), p.1358–1364.

Google Scholar

[13] Y.S. Ho and G. McKay: Water Res Vol 34 (2000), p.735–742.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Voisin, L. Bergström, P. Liu, and A.P. Mathew: Nanomaterials Vol 7(3) (2017), p.57.

Google Scholar