Study of Consistency between Two-Dimensional, sin2ψ, cosα and Fourier Transformation Methods for X-Ray Residual Stress Measurement by Debye Ring Simulation

Muneyuki Imafuku; Yuki Ishikawa

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.941.2407

Paper Titles

Portable System for the Measure of Efficiency in Arc Welding Processes
p.2384

Proving the Preclusion of Data Manipulation Using Parallel Data Acquisition in Chromatography
p.2390

SteBLife – The Enhanced Short-Time Evaluation Procedure for Materials Fatigue Data Generation
p.2395

Microstructure Characterisation of Advanced Materials via 2D and 3D X-Ray Refraction Techniques
p.2401

Study of Consistency between Two-Dimensional, sin²ψ, cosα and Fourier Transformation Methods for X-Ray Residual Stress Measurement by Debye Ring Simulation
p.2407

Recycle Processor for Commercial Aircraft Wing Trimmings
p.2413

Strength and Axial Behavior of Cellular Lightweight Concrete-Filled Steel Rectangular Tube Columns under Axial Compression
p.2417

Implementation and Use of a Laser-Ultrasonic System in a Deformation- and Quenching Dilatometer
p.2423

Quality Assessment of Friction Stir Welded Joints – Using the Fundamental Anti-Symmetric Lamb Wave Mode
p.2429

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 941Study of Consistency between Two-Dimensional,...

Study of Consistency between Two-Dimensional, sin²ψ, cosα and Fourier Transformation Methods for X-Ray Residual Stress Measurement by Debye Ring Simulation

Abstract:

We investigated the consistency of four methods by analyzing the distorted Debye rings with various stress states. Firstly, the distorted Debye rings were generated under various uni-, bi-and tri-axial stress states by using the fundamental stress-strain relationship in two dimensional X-ray stress analysis theory. Secondly, we performed reverse analysis of stress states in the frameworks of sin²ψ and cosα methods from the simulated Debye rings. Moreover, the profiles of simulated Debye rings were Fourier transformed and the stress states were calculated in accordance with the obtained 1st and 2nd order Fourier coefficients. As a result, it was confirmed that all these methods provide the same stress values. That is to say, all these methods are consistent. Therefore, we can guarantee the validity of choosing any appropriate method considering the geometrical restrictions of experiment.