Fractal Characterization of Relative Movement Modes in Simulated Friction and Wear Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

The selection of the relative movement mode between the friction pairs in simulated friction and wear tests is a crucial factor for the characterization and evaluation of metallic material properties. In this study, two kinds of commonly used metal materials (stainless steel 0Cr18Ni9 and aluminum alloy 2A12) were applied for the simulated friction and wear tests with four different modes of relative motion, including unidirectional, reciprocating, circular and multi-directional cross-shear. The corresponding surface topography and statistical parameters such as surface roughness Ra were obtained via OLYMPUS ultra-depth microscope. Based on the fractal theory, fractal dimension D was calculated to characterize the surface topography and the results indicate that, the fractal dimension D of the unidirectional and multi-directional cross-shear simulated friction and wear tests is the minimum and maximum respectively, which reflects that the fractal dimension D is able to characterize the complexity of the surface morphology. The fractal dimension D may be related to the intrinsic physical properties of metal materials, such as hardness and toughness, which needs to be further studied.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

426-431

Citation:

Online since:

January 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B.B. Mandelbrot., D.E. Passoja., A.J. Paullay. Fractal Character of Fracture Surfaces of Metal[J]. Nature, 1984, 308(5961): 721-722.

DOI: 10.1038/308721a0

Google Scholar

[2] Sayles and T.R. Thomas. Surface Topography as a Non-Stationary Random Process[J]. Nature, 1978, 271: 431-434.

DOI: 10.1038/271431a0

Google Scholar

[3] L. He, J. Zhu. The Fractal Character of Processed Metal Surfaces[J]. Wear, 1997, 208: 17-24.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(96)07330-9

Google Scholar

[4] S.R. Ge, K. Tonder. The Fractal Behavior and Fractal Characterization of Rough Surfaces[J]. Tribology, 1997, 17(1): 73-80.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Sahoo, T. Barman, J.P. Davim. Fractal Analysis in Machining[J]. Springerbriefs in Applied Sciences & Technology, 2011, 3: 69-81.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17922-8_5

Google Scholar

[6] M.D. Feo, M.I.D.B. Bouchet, C. Minfray, C. Esnouf, T.L. Mogne. Formation of Interfacial Molybdenum Carbide for DLC Lubricated by MoDTC: Origin of Wear Mechanism[J]. Wear, 2017, 370-371: 17-28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2016.10.002

Google Scholar

[7] S. Odelros, B. Kaplan, M. Kritikos, M. Johansson, S. Norgren. Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Microscopic Crater Wear Mechanism in Titanium Machining[J]. Wear, 2017, 376-377: 115-124.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.104

Google Scholar

[8] J.G. Corrêa, R.B. Schroeter, Á.R. Machado. Tool Life and Wear Mechanism Analysis of Carbide Tools used in the Machining of Martensitic and Supermartensitic Stainless Steels[J]. Tribology International, 2017, 105: 102-117.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2016.09.035

Google Scholar

[9] R.D. Peng, H.P. Xie, and Y. Ju. Computation Method of Fractal Dimension for 2-D Digital Image[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2004, 33(1): 19-24.

Google Scholar

[10] W. Jiang, C.C. Ji, and H. Zhu. Fractal Study on Plant Classification and Identification[C]. International Workshop on Chaos-fractals Theories & Applications, 2009: 434-438.

DOI: 10.1109/iwcfta.2009.98

Google Scholar

[11] E. W. Patten, D.V. Citters, M.D. Ries, L.A. Pruitt. Quantifying Cross-Shear Under Translation, Rolling, and Rotation, and its Effect on UHMWPE Wear[J]. Wear, 2014, 313(1-2): 125-134.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2014.03.001

Google Scholar