Designing Novel Multiferroic Perovskite Oxide for Prospective Photovoltaic Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Multiferroics, with two or more coexisting ferroic orders (ferroelectric, ferro (antiferro)-magnetic) in a single phase, display promising photovoltaic characteristics which can be utilised in solar energy harvesting. However, the efficacy is seriously challenged due to their wide band gap, far from the ideal value of ~1.52 eV for photovoltaic applications, resulting in overall unimpressive performance. In the present work, an approach towards imparting multiferroism in an otherwise non-ferroic system was adopted through strain engineering. Bulk SrMnO3 (SMO) is antiferromagnetic-paraelectric. However, our previous first-principles studies predicted high-pressure phase transformation from bulk non-polar phase to a tetragonal polar phase. In light of the above, SMO was synthesised hydrothermally at 200°C for 96 h using water-soluble nitrate salts of strontium and manganese. FESEM study reveals the formation of hexagonal bipyramid shaped SMO crystals with elongated 1-D features. Powder x-ray diffraction studies and subsequent Rietveld refinement confirm the presence of hexagonal (P63/mmc) as well as tetragonal (P4mm) phases. Energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDAX) confirms Sr/Mn ≈ 1, the stoichiometric ratio. UV-VIS spectroscopy was utilised to estimate the optical bandgap of the as-grown sample which was found to be in the range of 1.4-1.5 eV. Temperature-dependent magnetisation plot indicates the magnetic transition temperature, ~275K.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

353-359

Citation:

Online since:

February 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Schmid, Ferroelectrics 162 (1994) 317–338.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Eerenstein, N.D. Mathur, J.F. Scott, Nature 442 (2006) 759.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Nechache, C. Harnagea, S. Li, L. Cardenas, W. Huang, J. Chakrabartty, F. Rosei, Nature Photonics 9 (2014) 61.

DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.255

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Syono, S. Akimoto, K. Kohn, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 26 (1969) 993–999.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Musa Saad H.-E., Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices 2 (2017) 115–122.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Kuroda, N. Ishizawa, N. Mizutani, M. Kato, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 38 (1981) 297–299.

Google Scholar

[7] X.-Y. Chen, W. Zhu, S.-Y. Lin, Y.-J. Zhao, Computational Materials Science 83 (2014) 394–397.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Negas, R.S. Roth, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 1 (1970) 409–418.

Google Scholar

[9] R.S. Tichy, J.B. Goodenough, Solid State Sciences 4 (2002) 661–664.

Google Scholar

[10] T. Negas, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 7 (1973) 85–88.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Mao, S. Banerjee, S.S. Wong, Chemical Communications (2003) 408–409.

Google Scholar

[12] H. Hayashi, Y. Hakuta, Materials 3 (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] C.Y. Song, J. Xu, A. Yimamu, L. Wang, Integrated Ferroelectrics 153 (2014) 33–41.

Google Scholar

[14] J. Spooren, R.I. Walton, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 178 (2005) 1683–1691.

Google Scholar

[15] J.-S. Zhu, J.-B. Liu, H. Wang, M.-K. Zhu, H. Yan, Crystal Research and Technology 42 (2007) 241–246.

Google Scholar

[16] J. Carvajal, Abstracts of the Satellite Meeting on Powder Diffraction of the XV Congress of the IUCr (1990).

Google Scholar