Mathematical Modeling оf the Silicon Production Process from Pelletized Charge

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper considers the problem of recycling the dust waste resulting from metallurgical silicon production; such dust contains considerable amounts of valuable silica. The problem is solved by redirecting this byproduct to the silicon smelting process. We herein propose using the dust left in silicon and aluminum production as a component of pelletized charge, used for silicon smelting in ore-thermal furnaces (OTF). Mathematical (physico-chemical) modeling was applied to study the behavior of pelletized-charge components, in order to predict the chemical composition of smelting-produced silicon. We generated a model that simulated the four temperature zones of a furnace, as well as the crystalline-silicon phase (25°С). The model contained 17 elements entering the furnace, due to being contained in raw materials, electrodes, and the air. Modeling produced molten silicon, 91.73 wt% of which was the target product. Modeling showed that, when using the proposed combined charge, silicon extraction factor would amount to 69.25%, which agrees well with practical data. Results of modeling the chemical composition of crystalline silicon agreed well with the chemical analysis of actually produced silicon.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

394-399

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] V.M. Sizyakov, A.A. Vlasov, V.Yu. Bazhin, Strategy tasks of the Russian metallurgical complex, Tsvetnye Metally. 1 (2016) 32-37.

DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2016.01.05

Google Scholar

[2] B.P. Kulikov, S.P. Istomin, Recycling aluminum production waste, second ed., Krasnoyarsk: Classic Center LLC, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] A.E. Patrushov, N.V. Nemchinova, V.E. Chernyh, A.A. Tyutrin, Modern methods of processing of technogenic raw materials of electric steel production, Irkutsk: Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 4 (2018) 183–190.

DOI: 10.21285/1814-3520-2018-4-183-190

Google Scholar

[4] N.V. Nemchinova, L.V. Shumilova, S.P. Salkhofer, K.K. Razmakhnin, O.A. Chernova, Complex sustainable waste management. Metallurgical industry, Publishing House of Academy of Natural History, Moscow, (2016).

Google Scholar

[5] M.I. Gasik, M.M. Gasik, Electrothermy of silicon, Dnepropetrovsk: National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine, (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] E. Ringdalen, M. Tangstad, Reaction mechanisms in carbothermic production of silicon, study of selected reactions, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society. (2012) 195–203.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118364765.ch24

Google Scholar

[7] J. Vangskåsen, Metal-producing Mechanisms in the Carbothermic Silicon Process, NTNU-Trondheim, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] I. Kero, S. Grådahl, G. Tranell, Airborne emissions from Si/FeSi production, JOM. 2 (2017) 365-380.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-016-2149-x

Google Scholar

[9] N.V. Nemchinova, A.A. Tyutrin, Yu.V. Sokolnikova, T.T. Fereferova, Analytical investigations of silicon production raw materials and products, Journal of Siberian Federal University-Chemistry. 1 (2017) 37-48.

DOI: 10.17516/1998-2836-0004

Google Scholar

[10] J. Thonstad, P. Fellner, G.M. Haarberg, J. Hivas, H. Kvande and A. Sterten, Aluminium electrolysis, third ed., Dusseldorf: Aluminium Verlag, (2001).

Google Scholar

[11] H. Gaertner, A.P. Ratvik, T.A. Aarhaug, Particulate emissions from electrolysis cells, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society. (2011) 345-350.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118061992.ch62

Google Scholar

[12] A.M. Vinogradov, A.A. Pinaev, D.A. Vinogradov, A.V. Puzin, V.G. Shadrin, N.V. Zor'ko, V.V. Somov, Improving the efficiency of the shelter Soderberg electrolyzers, Izvestiya vuzov. Tsvetnaya metallurgiya. 1 (2017) 19-30.

DOI: 10.17073/0021-3438-2017-1-19-30

Google Scholar

[13] A.N. Baranov, P.A. Yakushevich, Briquetting of fluorocarbon-containing aluminum production wastes, Academic Journal of Western Siberia. 3 (2014) 128–130.

Google Scholar

[14] A.N. Baranov, P.A. Yakushevich, E.V. Timkina, Production of briquettes from aluminum production wastes and their physico-chemical properties, Irkutsk: Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 11 (2012) 143-148.

DOI: 10.21285/1814-3520-2017-7-143-151

Google Scholar

[15] N.V. Nemchinova, G.G. Mineev, A.A. Tyutrin, A.A. Yakovleva, Utilization of dust from silicon production, Steel in Translation. 12 (2017) 763–767.

DOI: 10.3103/s0967091217120087

Google Scholar

[16] O.V. Avchenko, K.V. Chudnenko, I.A. Aleksandov, Fundamentals of physico-chemical modeling of mineral systems, Moscow: Nauka, (2009).

Google Scholar

[17] N.V. Nemchinova, S.S. Bel'skij, A.V. Aksenov, A.A. Vasil'ev, Using the free energy minimization parameter to study metallurgical processes, Irkutsk: Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 3 (2014) 151-158.

Google Scholar

[18] A.A. Tyutrin, A.K. Timofeev, Application of mathematical modeling methods in studying the processes of obtaining and refining metallurgical nitrogen. Modern problems of science and education. 4 (2012).

Google Scholar

[19] I.K. Karpov, K.V. Chudnenko, D.A. Kulik Modeling chemical mass transfer in gheochemical processes: thermodynamic relations, conditions of equilibria, and numerical algorithms, Amer. J. Sci. 8 (1997) 767–806.

DOI: 10.2475/ajs.297.8.767

Google Scholar

[20] D.A. Kulik, GEM-Selektor geochemical modeling package: revised algorithm and GEMS3K numerical kernel for coupled simulation codes, Computational Geosciences. 1 (2013) 1–24.

DOI: 10.1007/s10596-012-9310-6

Google Scholar

[21] S.J.B. Reed, Electron microprobe analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, (1997).

Google Scholar