Cleavage Fracture Evaluation Using Local Approach for SA508 Carbon Steel at -60°C

Article Preview

Abstract:

The scatter of measured fracture toughness data and transferability problems for specimens with different crack configurations and loading conditions are major obstacles for integrity assessment of ferritic steels in ductile-brittle transition region. To address these issues, recently, concerns for local approach adopting micro-mechanical damage models are being increased again in connection with a progress of computational technology. In this paper, cleavage fracture evaluation based on Weibull statistics was carried out for SA508 carbon steel. A series of three dimensional finite element analyses as well as corresponding fracture toughness tests were performed for 1T-CT and PCVN specimens at -60°C. Also, failure probability analyses for different configurations and sensitivity analyses for Weibull parameters were conducted. Thereby, promising results have been derived through comparison between measured and estimated fracture toughness data, which can be utilized to make the basis for demonstrating real safety margins of components containing defect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 110)

Pages:

193-200

Citation:

Online since:

March 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Xia and C.F. Shih: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids Vol. 44 (1996), pp.603-639.

Google Scholar

[2] F.M. Beremin: Metallurgical Transactions Vol. 14A (1983), pp.2277-2287.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Mudry: Nuclear Engineering and Design Vol. 105 (1987), pp.65-76.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Minami, A. Brückner-foit, D. Munz and B. Trolldenier: International Journal of Fracture Vol. 54 (1992), pp.197-210.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00035355

Google Scholar

[5] X. Gao, R. H. Dodds Jr, R. L. Tregoning, J. A. Joyce and R. E. Link: Fatigue and Fracture Engineering Materials and Structures Vol. 22 (1999), pp.481-493.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00202.x

Google Scholar

[6] X. Gao, C. Ruggieri, R.H. Dodds, JR.: International Journal of Fracture Vol. 92 (1998), pp.175-200.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Lei, N.P. O'Dowd, E.P. Busso, G.A. Webster: International Journal of Fracture Vol. 89 (1998), pp.245-268.

Google Scholar

[8] N.P. O'Dowd, Y. Lei and E.P. Busso: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol. 67(2000), pp.87-100.

Google Scholar

[9] L.C. A Folch and F.M. Burdekin: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol. 63 (1999), pp.57-80.

Google Scholar