Paper Titles

Simulation of 3D Layer-By-Layer Photonic Crystals
p.1165

Stiffness Prediction of Nano-Fibers Composite Ceramics
p.1171

Surface Boundary Effect in Electron-Solid Interactions
p.1175

Surface-Area-Difference Model for Melting Temperature of Metallic Nanocrystals Embedded in a Matrix
p.1181

Theoretical Study of Differences between Surface and Bulk Electronic States in Cu Clusters
p.1189

Large Area, Nanoparticulate Metal Oxide Coatings for Consumer Nanotechnologies
p.1193

Nano-Structured Carbon Nitride Films for Microsensor Applications
p.1199

A Novel Magnetostrictive Drive Rotary Motor
p.1203

Development of Robust Microvavles for Compact Robust Pumps/Hydraulic Actuators
p.1207

HomeSolid State PhenomenaSolid State Phenomena Vols. 121-123Theoretical Study of Differences between Surface...

Theoretical Study of Differences between Surface and Bulk Electronic States in Cu Clusters

Article Preview

Abstract:

The size-dependent electronic structures of metal clusters Cun (n=2-20) have been calculated using density functional theory method. The results reveal that their electronic properties are almost the same as bulk material if the cluster size larger than a critical value. The properties can be understood by a surface-noncrystalline-layer model that composed of an interior crystalline-like core and an outer surface noncrystalline layer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Nanoscience and Technology

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 121-123)

Pages:

1189-1192

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.121-123.1189

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2007

Authors:

Ying Dai, Bai Biao Huang, Run Long, Lin Yu

Keywords:

Metal Cluster, Surface Electronic State

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. Eberhardt. Surf. Sci. Vol. 500 (2002), p.242.

[2] W. Knight, K. clamenger, W.A. de Heer, W.A. Saunders, M.Y. Chou, M.L. Cohen. Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 52 (1984), p.2141.

[3] J. P. Perdew. Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 37 (1988), p.6175.

[4] P. N. First, Joseph, A. Stroscio, R.A. Dragoset, D.T. Pierce, and R.J. Celottra. Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 63 (1989), p.1416.

[5] W. de Hear, Rev. Mod. Phys. Vol. 65 (1993), p.611.

[6] C. Massobrio et al, Chem. Phys. Lett. Vol. 238 (1995), p.215.

[7] A. Bifone, L. Casalis and R. Riva, Phys. Rev. B. Vol. 51 (1995), p.11043.

[8] C.P. Collier, R.J. Saykally, J.J. Shiang, S.E. Henrichs, J.R. Heath, Science Vol. 277 (1997), p. (1978).

[9] C.P. Vinod, G.U. Kulkarni, C.N.R. Rao, Chem. Phys. Lett. Vol. 289 (1998), p.329.

[10] M. Aslam, I.S. Mulla, and K. Vijayamohanan. Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 79 (2001), p.689.

[11] J. Li, X. Li, H-J. Zhai, L.S. Wang. Science, Vol. 299 (2003), p.864.

[12] K. Jug, B. Zimmermann, P. Calaminici and A. M. Koster, J. Chem. Phys. Vol. 116 (2002), p.4497.

[13] J. J Zhao. Phys. Rev. A. Vol. 64 (2001), p.0403244.

[14] Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF2003), SCM, Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan Amsterdam, Netherlands (www. scm. com).

[15] S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair. Can. J. Phys. Vol. 58 (1980), p.1200.

[16] A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A. Vol. 38 (1988), p.3098.

[17] J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang. Phys. Rev. B. Vol. 33 (1986), p.8800.