Effect of Substrate RF-Bias on Exchange Coupling in Fe20Ni80/Fe50Mn50 Films

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of physical and technological factors on the effectiveness of the exchange coupling in two-layer film structures such as Fe20Ni80/Fe50Mn50 has been investigated. The dependences of the coercive force and the exchange bias field of permalloy layer on presence of a buffer Ta layer and its thickness, the order of sputtering and the thickness of Fe20Ni80 and Fe50Mn50 layers, substrate temperature and the features of radio-frequency (RF) substrate bias during deposition were investigated. It has been found that the substrate RF bias improves homogeneity of microstructure and reduces the surface roughness of permalloy layer. This in turn increases the magnetic pinning of permalloy layer and creates the prerequisites for the practical application of layered structures with higher thickness of the ferromagnetic layers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 215)

Pages:

278-283

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Coehoorn. Giant Magnetoresistance and Magnetic Interactions in Exchange-Biased Spin-Valves/ Handbook of magnetic materials (edited by K.H.J. Buschow). 15 (2003). 1-198.

DOI: 10.1016/s1567-2719(03)15001-9

Google Scholar

[2] J. Nogués, J. Sort, V. Langlais, V. Skumryev, S. Surinach, J.S. Munoz, M.D. Baro, Phys. Rep. 422 (2005) 65-117.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Dieny. Spin valves. Magnetoelectronics (edited by M. Johnson). (2004) 67-149.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Ripka, K. Zaveta. Magnetic Sensors: Principles and Applications. Handbook of magnetic materials (edited by K.H.J. Buschow). 18 (2009) 347-420.

DOI: 10.1016/s1567-2719(09)01803-4

Google Scholar

[5] G.V. Kurlyandskaya, D. de Cos, S.O. Volchkov, Russian J. Non-Destr. Testing 45 (2009) 377-398.

Google Scholar

[6] V.O. Vas'kovskii, K.G. Balymov, A.A. Yuvchenko, A.V. Svalov, A.N. Sorokin, N.A. Kulesh, Tech. Phys. 56 (2011) 981-985.

DOI: 10.1134/s106378421107022x

Google Scholar

[7] V.O. Vas'kovskii, P.A. Savin, S.O. Volchkov, V.N. Lepalovskii, D.A. Bukreev, A.A. Buchkevich, Tech. Phys. 58 (2013) 105-110.

DOI: 10.1134/s1063784213010222

Google Scholar

[8] V.P. Nascimento, E.C. Passamani, A.D. Alvarenga, F. Pelegrini, A. Biondo, E. Baggio Saitovitch, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 (2008) e272-e274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.02.059

Google Scholar

[9] C. Schlenker, S.S.P. Parkin, J.C. Scott, K. Howard, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 54-57 (1986) 801-802.

Google Scholar

[10] Nascimento V.P., Passamani E.C., Alvarenga A.D., Pelegrini F., Biondo A., Baggio S.E. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 (2008) e272-e274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.02.059

Google Scholar