Comparison of Feed Drives with a Process Oriented Design Methodology

Matthias Rehm; Johannes QUELLMALZ; Holger Schlegel; Reimund Neugebauer

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.260.11

Paper Titles

Preface, Committees, Sponsors and Organizers

Affect in Robots for Interaction and Control - Challenges for the Engineer
p.3

Comparison of Feed Drives with a Process Oriented Design Methodology
p.11

Intelligent Robot Systems for Manipulation of Non-Rigid Objects
p.20

Comparison of Suspension Systems and Chassis of Selected Mars Rovers Analogs with a Focus on Introduced Improvement
p.33

Control of Mobile Robots with Bounded Inputs in a Rigid Formation
p.38

Differential Control of Six-Wheeled Robot Using a Mobile Application
p.45

Mobile Minirobot with Hybrid Locomotion
p.51

Versatile Soil Sampling System Capable of Collecting, Transporting, Storing and Preliminary Onboard Analysis for Mars Rover Analogue
p.59

HomeSolid State PhenomenaSolid State Phenomena Vol. 260Comparison of Feed Drives with a Process Oriented...

Comparison of Feed Drives with a Process Oriented Design Methodology

Abstract:

The paper points out a novel design methodology for electromechanical linear axis. It is based on common process parameters and an automated iterative solution algorithm. For the first time ever, different types of electromechanical linear axes can be compared. Furthermore, an optimum solution aiming a low moment of inertia ratio is the result of the design process. Using the example of a machining center, simulation and experimental results are shown. The performance of the process-oriented design methodology relating to additional design objectives is shown in this context.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 260)

Pages:

11-19

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.260.11

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2017

Authors:

Matthias Rehm*, Johannes QUELLMALZ, Holger Schlegel, Reimund Neugebauer

Keywords:

Control, Coupled Drives, Design Methodology, Linear Motor

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Y. Altintas, A. Verl, C. Brecher, L. Uriarte, G. Pritschow, Machine tool feed drives, in: CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 60, 2011, pp.779-796.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.010

Google Scholar

[2] O. Zirn, S. Weickert, Modellbildung und Simulation hochdynamischer Fertigungssysteme, Springer Verlag, 2006. [in german].

Google Scholar

[3] H. Gross, J. Hamann, G. Wiegaertner, Elektrische Vorschubantriebe in der Automatisierungstechnik, Publics Corporate Publishing Verlag, Erlangen, 2006. [in german].

Google Scholar

[4] M. Rehm, J. Quellmalz, H. Schlegel, R. Neugebauer, Classification of coupled linear motors by using a development methodology. MM Science Journal, p.622 – 626, 2015. doi: 10. 17973/MMSJ. 2015_06_201521.

DOI: 10.17973/mmsj.2015_06_201521

Google Scholar

[5] VDI 2206, Entwicklungsmethodik für Mechatronische Systeme. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 2004. [in german].

Google Scholar

[6] M. Rehm, Analyse mechanisch gekoppelter, gegenläufig verfahrender Direktantriebe und ihre Einordnung mittels prozessorientierter Entwicklungsmethodik, Dissertation, TU Chemnitz, 2016. [in german].

Google Scholar

[7] D. Schroeder, Elektrische Antriebe, Springer Verlag, 2009. [in german].

Google Scholar

[8] U. Riefenstahl, Elektrische Antriebssysteme – Grundlagen, Komponenten, Regelverfahren, Bewegungssteuerung, Vieweg und Teuber Verlag, 2010. [in german].

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-38008-3_6

Google Scholar