FEA-Based Comparative Investigation on High Speed Machining of Aluminum Alloys AA6061-T6 and AA7075-T651

Article Preview

Abstract:

Independent research studies have shown notable dissimilarity in the machining behaviour of aluminum alloys AA6061−T6 and AA7075−T651 commonly used in automotive and aeronautical applications. The present work attempts to investigate this dissimilarity based on experimental and numerical data with a focus on chip formation and generated residual stresses under similar high−speed machining (HSM) conditions. The numerical data were calculated by a finite element modeling (FEM) developed using DeformTM 2D software. The results showed that both studied alloys exhibit different chip formation mechanisms and residual stress states at the machined surfaces. On one hand, the AA6061−T6 alloy generates continuous chips and tensile residual stresses whereas the AA7075−T651 alloy produces segmented chips and compressive residual stresses. FEM results showed that the AA6061−T6 alloy generates lower cutting temperature at the tool−chip interface along with higher equivalent total strains at the machined surface as compared to the AA7075−T651 alloy. Based on the experimental and numerical results, it was pointed out that the differences in terms of thermal conductivity and initial yield stress are the main reasons explaining the dissimilarity observed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 261)

Pages:

347-353

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Rao, Y.C. Shin, Analysis on high-speed face-milling of 7075-T6 aluminum using carbide and diamond cutters, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 41 (2001) 1763-1781.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00033-5

Google Scholar

[2] W. Jomaa, Contributions to Understanding the High Speed Machining Effects on Aeronautic Part Surface Integrity, Ph.D. thesis, École de technologie supérieure, Canada, 2015, p.240.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Mabrouki, F. Girardin, M. Asad, J. -F. Rigal, Numerical and experimental study of dry cutting for an aeronautic aluminium alloy (A2024-T351), Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 48 (2008) 1187-1197.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.03.013

Google Scholar

[4] G. Ye, Y. Chen, S. Xue, L. Dai, Critical cutting speed for onset of serrated chip flow in high speed machining, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 86 (2014) 18-33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.06.006

Google Scholar

[5] W. Jomaa, O. Mechri, J. Lévesque, V. Songmene, P. Bocher, A. Gakwaya, Finite element simulation and analysis of serrated chip formation during high–speed machining of AA7075–T651 alloy, J. of Manuf. Processes, 26 (2017) 446-458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.02.015

Google Scholar

[6] D. Xu, P. Feng, W. Li, Y. Ma, B. Liu, Research on chip formation parameters of aluminum alloy 6061-T6 based on high-speed orthogonal cutting model, Int J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 72 (2014) 955-962.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-5700-3

Google Scholar

[7] R. Kazban, K.V. Pena, J. Mason, Measurements of forces and temperature fields in high-speed machining of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy, Exp. Mech., 48 (2008) 307-317.

DOI: 10.1007/s11340-007-9069-1

Google Scholar

[8] M. Daoud, W. Jomaa, J. Chatelain, A. Bouzid, A machining-based methodology to identify material constitutive law for finite element simulation, Int J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 77 (2015) 2019-(2033).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6583-z

Google Scholar

[9] S. Timothy, The structure of adiabatic shear bands in metals: a critical review, Acta metal., 35 (1987) 301-306.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(87)90238-0

Google Scholar

[10] Y.J. Chao, X. Qi, Thermal and thermo-mechanical modeling of friction stir welding of aluminum alloy 6061-T6, J. Mater. Process. Manuf. Sci. 7 (1998) 215-233.

DOI: 10.1106/ltkr-jfbm-rgmv-wvcf

Google Scholar

[11] N. Fang, Q. Wu, The effects of chamfered and honed tool edge geometry in machining of three aluminum alloys, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 45 (2005) 1178-1187.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.12.003

Google Scholar

[12] T. Marusich, M. Ortiz, Modelling and simulation of high-speed machining, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 38 (1995) 3675-3694.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620382108

Google Scholar

[13] W. Jomaa, V. Songmene, P. Bocher, An Hybrid Approach Based on Machining and Dynamic Tests Data for the Identification of Material Constitutive Equations, J. Mat. Eng. Perfor., 25 (2016) 1010-1027.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-016-1950-6

Google Scholar

[14] M.N. Nasr, E. -G. Ng, M. Elbestawi, Effects of strain hardening and initial yield strength on machining-induced residual stresses, J. Eng. Mater. Tech. 129 (2007) 567-579.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2772338

Google Scholar