The Surface Chemistry Characterization of Pyrite, Sphalerite and Molybdenite after Bioleaching

Article Preview

Abstract:

The mineral surface chemistry characterization is essential to describe the dissolution kinetics in leaching and bioleaching. Five different methods, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman Spectroscopy, have been applied to study the surface chemistry changes during pyrite, sphalerite and molybdenite bioleaching. The surface characterizations have been done for samples before and after biological and chemical leaching. The SEM images illustrated that the minerals surfaces were smooth before processing, while they covered with an ash layer after biological treatment. Although EDS analysis and Raman spectrum demonstrated the potassium jarosite formation on the pyrite surface during bioleaching, the formation of jarosite layer did not occur on the sphalerite surfaces during bioleaching. On the other hand, a sulfur layer formation on the sphalerite surface was confirmed by mentioned characterization methods. Finally, according to the XRD and EDS spectrum the molybdenite surface had been covered both with sulfur and jarosite.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 262)

Pages:

487-491

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.D. Souza, P.S., Pina, V.A., Leao, Bioleaching and chemical leaching as an integrated process in the zinc industry, Min. Eng. 20‏ (2007) 591-599.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2006.12.014

Google Scholar

[2] J. Han, W. Liu, W. Qin, B. Peng, K. Yang, Y. Zheng, Recovery of zinc and iron from high iron-bearing zinc calcine by selective reduction roasting, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 22(2015)272-279.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.07.020

Google Scholar

[3] R. Dehghan, M. Noaparast, M. Kolahdoozan, Leaching and kinetic modelling of low-grade calcareous sphalerite in acidic ferric chloride solution, Hydrometallurgy 96 (2009) 275-282.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.11.002

Google Scholar

[4] A.H. Kaksonen, C. Morris, S. Rea, J. Li, K.M. Usher, R. McDonald, F. Hilario, T. Hosken, M. Jackson, C. du Plessis, Biohydrometallurgical iron oxidation and precipitation: Part II –Jarosite precipitate characterisation and acid recovery by conversion to hematite, Hydrometallurgy. 147 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.04.015

Google Scholar

[5] S. Panda, A. Biswal, S. Mishra, P.K. Panda, N. Pradhan, U. Mohapatra, L.B. Sukla, B.K. Mishra, A. Akcil, Reductive dissolution by waste newspaper for enhanced meso-acidophilic bioleaching of copper from low grade chalcopyrite: A new concept of biohydrometallurgy, Hydrometallurgy. 153 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.02.006

Google Scholar

[6] K. Sasaki, Y. Nakamuta, T. Hirajima, O.H. Tuovinen, Raman characterization of secondary minerals formed during chalcopyrite leaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Hydrometallurgy. 95 (2009) 153-158.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.05.009

Google Scholar

[7] C. Varotsis, C. Giangou, S. Papadatos, Probing the formation of secondary minerals in the bioleaching reactions of chalcopyrite by Raman and FTIR microspectroscopy, New Biotechnology, 31 (2014) 139-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.05.1958

Google Scholar