Improving Masonry and Protective Paints Quality

Abstract:

The environment, along with other reasons, is a key factor influencing the living conditions of urban population in Russia today. One of the main drawbacks restraining the process of aesthetic improvement of modern Russian cities is the unsatisfactory protection of buildings from the atmospheric phenomena. Industrial waste, however, is another reason preventing long-lasting decoration of urban buildings. The article presents an overview of the composition and physical properties of masonry paints used in Chelyabinsk Region. The traditional technology of obtaining coatings, e.g. liquid glass, is studied, the drawbacks of this technology are examined, the new applications are offered. The influence of additives on the basic properties of masonry paints, viz. weather resistance, viscosity, hardness, cost, is considered. The application of new technologies utilizing industrial waste can solve the above-stated problem, which also will, along with improving the basic physical and chemical properties, result in reducing the cost and increasing the hardness of masonry paints.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 265)
• Pages: 359-364
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.265.359
• Online since: September 2017
• Authors: A.V. Vyboishchik*, I.L. Kostiunina
• Keywords: Building Materials, Ecology, Hardness, Industrial Waste, Masonry Paints, Pigment, Protective Paints

References

[1] A.D. Basiago, Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice, The Environmentalist, 19(2) 1998 145-161.

[2] X. Fang, W. Jiang, S. Miao et al., The multi-scale numerical modeling system for research on the relationship between urban planning and meteorological environment, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 21 (1) 2004 103-112.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02915684

[3] M. Faehnle, T. Soderman, H. Schulman, Scale-sensitive integration of ecosystem services in urban planning, GeoJournal, 80 (3) 2015 411-425.

DOI: 10.1007/s10708-014-9560-z

[4] H. Azadi, A.A. Barati, P. Rafiaani, et al., Evolution of land use-change modeling: routes of different schools of knowledge, Landscape and Ecological Engineering, (2016) 1-14.

DOI: 10.1007/s11355-016-0311-9

[5] D.J. Nowak, R.E. Hoehn, A.R. Bodine, et al., Urban forest structure, ecosystem services and change in Syracuse, NY, Urban Ecosystems, 19 (4) 2016 1455-1477.

DOI: 10.1007/s11252-013-0326-z

[6] K.L. Larson, K.C. Nelson, S.R. Samples, et al., Ecosystem services in managing residential landscapes: priorities, value dimensions, and cross-regional patterns, Urban Ecosystems, 19(1) 2016 95-113.

DOI: 10.1007/s11252-015-0477-1

[7] T. Yigitcanlar, S. Teriman, Rethinking sustainable urban development: towards an integrated planning and development process, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(1) 2015 341-352.

DOI: 10.1007/s13762-013-0491-x

[8] J. Niemela, Ecology and urban planning, Biodiversity and Conservation, 8(1) 1999 119-131.

[9] Y. Hu, G.F. Dargush, X. Shao, A conceptual evolutionary aseismic decision support framework for hospitals, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11(4) 2012 499-512.

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-012-0137-x

[10] M. An, M.J. Chen, An iterative approach to an integrated land use and transportation planning tool for small urban areas, Journal of Modern Transportation, 20(3) 2012 160-167.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03325794

[11] K. Cai, J. Wang, Urban design based on public safety-Discussion on safety-based urban design, Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 3(2) 2009 219-227.

DOI: 10.1007/s11709-009-0023-4

[12] K. Sapountzaki, S. Wanczura, G. Casertano, et al., Disconnected policies and actors and the missing role of spatial planning throughout the risk management cycle, Natural Hazards, 59(3) 2011 1445-1474.

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9843-3

[13] N. Graveline, B. Aunay, J.L. Fusillier, et al., Coping with Urban & Agriculture Water Demand Uncertainty in Water Management Plan Design: the Interest of Participatory Scenario Analysis, Water Resources Management, 28(10) 2014 3075-3093.

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0656-5

[14] J.S. Chou, J.H. Wu, Success factors of enhanced disaster resilience in urban community, Natural Hazards, 74(2) 2014 661-686.

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1206-4

[15] A. Rumbach, M. Shirgaokar, Predictors of household exposure to monsoon rain hazards in informal settlements, Natural Hazards, 85(2) 2017 709-728.

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2599-z

[16] H.E. Berg, T.K. BenDor, A Case Study of Form-Based Solutions for Watershed Protection, Environmental Management, 46(3) 2010 436-451.

DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9516-0

[17] D.K. Knofel, D. Hoffmann, R. Snethlage, Physico-chemical weathering reactions as a formulary for time-lapsing ageing tests, Materials and Structures, 20(2) 1987 127-145.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02472748

[18] E. Verstrynge, L. Schueremans, D.V. Gemert, Time-dependent mechanical behavior of lime-mortar masonry, Materials and Structures, 44(1) 2011 29-42.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-010-9606-8

[19] S. Pavia, E. Treacy, A comparative study of the durability and behaviour of fat lime and feebly-hydraulic lime mortars, Materials and Structures, 39(3) 2006 391-398.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-005-9033-4

[20] C. Ince, M.A. Carter, M.A. Wilson, et al., Factors affecting the water retaining characteristics of lime and cement mortars in the freshly-mixed state, Materials and Structures, 44(2) 2011 509-516.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-010-9645-1

[21] R. Hanley, S. Pavia, A study of the workability of natural hydraulic lime mortars and its influence on strength, Materials and Structures, 41(2) 2008 373-381.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9250-0

[22] T. Zimmermann, A. Strauss, K. Bergmeister, Structural behavior of low- and normal-strength interface mortar of masonry, Materials and Structures, 45(6) 2012 829-839.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-011-9801-2

[23] L.W. Masters, E. Brandt, Prediction of service life of building materials and components, Materials and Structures, 20(1) 1987 55-77.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02472728

[24] V.S. Ramachandran, H.E. Ashton, Trends in building materials research, Materials and Structures, 19(5) 1986 337-342.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02472123