Research of Efficient Methods of Superplasticizer Introduction into Cement Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

The article presents the results of researching efficiency of different modes of superplasticizer introduction in solution mixture with different consistency - from hard to plastic. The following methods of superplasticizer introduction into cement were researched: co-grinding of superplasticizer with cement, mixing cement with superplasticizer in dry state, introduction of superplasticizer into cement with mixing water, evaluation of water reduction effect of an additive depending on the methods of its introduction into cement and the time of determining its consistency. It is established that the most efficient method of superplasticizer introduction into plastic mixture is its co-grinding with cement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 265)

Pages:

379-384

Citation:

Online since:

September 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] V.S. Ramachandran, Concrete Admixtures Handbook. Properties, Science and Technology, 2nd Edition, William Andrew Publishing, (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] P.C. Aitcin, High Performance Concrete, E&FN Spon, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Okamura, M. Ouchi, Self-Compacting Concrete, J. Adv. Concr. Technol, 1 (2003) 5-15.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Richard, M. Cheyrezy. Composition of reactive powder concretes, Cem. Concr. Res., 25(7) (1995) 150-151.

Google Scholar

[5] F. de Larrard, T. Sedran, Optimization of ultra-high-performance concrete by the use of a packing model, Cem. Concr. Res., 24(6) (1994) 997-1009.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(94)90022-1

Google Scholar

[6] S.K. Agarwal, I. Masood, S.K. Malhotra, Compatibility of superplasticizers with different cements, Const. Build. Mater. 14(5) (2000) 253-259.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(00)00025-8

Google Scholar

[7] P. Nkinamubanzi, P. Aïtcin, Cement and Superplasticizer Combinations: Compatibility and Robustness, Cem., Concr. and Aggr., 26(2) (2004) 1-8.

DOI: 10.1520/cca12329

Google Scholar

[8] M.M. Alonso, M. Palacios, F. Puertas, Compatibility between polycarboxylate-based admixtures and blended-cement pastes, Cem. Concr. Compos., 35(1) (2013) 151-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.020

Google Scholar

[9] M. Adjoudj, K. Ezziane, E. Hadj, T. Ngo, A. Kaci, Evaluation of rheological parameters of mortar containing various amounts of mineral addition with polycarboxylate superplasticizer, Constr. Build. Mater., 70 (2014) 549-559.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.111

Google Scholar

[10] L.G. Li, A. K.H. Kwan. Effects of superplasticizer type on packing density, water film thickness and flowability of cementitious paste, Constr. Build. Mater., 86 (2015) 113-119.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.104

Google Scholar

[11] E. Tkaczewska, Effect of the superplasticizer type on the properties of the fly ash blended cement, Constr. Build. Mater., 70 (2014) 388-393.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.096

Google Scholar

[12] A. Bahurudeen, A.V. Marckson, A. Kishore, M. Santhanam, Development of sugarcane bagasse ash based Portland pozzolana cement and evaluation of compatibility with superplasticizers, Constr. Build. Mater., 68 (2014) 465-475.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.013

Google Scholar

[13] O. Burgos-Montes, M. Palacios, P. Rivilla, F. Puertas, Compatibility between superplasticizer admixtures and cements with mineral additions, Constr. Build. Mater., 31 (2012) 300-309.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.092

Google Scholar

[14] H.W. Krauss, H. Budelmann, Effects of fine-grained inert mineral additives on fresh and hardening concrete, in: International RILEM Conference on Material Science – MATSCI, Aachen, 3 (2010) 357-365.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Hallal, E.H. Kadri, K. Ezziane, A. Kadri, H. Khelafi, Combined effect of mineral admixtures with superplasticizers on the fluidity of the blended cement paste, Constr. Build. Mater., 24(8) (2010) 1418-1423.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.015

Google Scholar

[16] S. Aydın, A. Hilmi Aytaç, K. Ramyar, Effects of fineness of cement on polynaphthalene sulfonate based superplasticizer–cement interaction, Constr. Build. Mater., 23(6) (2009) 2402-2408.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.10.004

Google Scholar

[17] B.E. Ioudovitch, A.M. Dmitriev, S.A. Zoubekhine, N.F. Bashlykov, V.R. Falikman, V.N. Serdyuk, Low water requirement binders as new generation cements, 10th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Goteborg, Sweden, (1997).

Google Scholar

[18] B.E. Yudovich, B.E. Zubekhin, Сement with a low water requirement and Portland cement with a tight contact zone, International Analytical Review ALITinform: Cement. Concrete. Dry Mixtures., 3 (2010) 48-56.

Google Scholar

[19] M.O. Korovkin, Study of the effectiveness of superplasticizer S-3 in binders with a low water requirement, Building and reconstruction., 2 (2011) 83-87.

Google Scholar

[20] M. Korovkin, N. Eroshkina. Influence of a Superplasticizer on Cement Grinding and Its Activity Reduction During Storage, Procedia Engineering, 150 (2016) 1600-1604.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.135

Google Scholar