Glass Fiber Reinforced Unsaturated Polyester: Effect of Nanoclay and Mixing Time on Tensile Modulus, Flammability, and Wear Resistance

Article Preview

Abstract:

Glass fiber reinforced unsaturated polyesters were prepared by hand lay-up technique. Effect of clay conditions and loading, as well as mixing time on tensile modulus, flammability, and wear resistance were evaluated. In general, the results showed that there might be two possible structures, dispersed and agglomerated, in the composite samples. The modulus results showed that the effect of clay drying, as well as higher filler loading increase the property. In contrast, the mixing time resulted in negative effect on modulus. The improvement on modulus and flammability might be influenced by clay dispersion due to shear and viscosity change, while the decrease on modulus and wear resistance might be caused by agglomerated structures due to lubrication effect of moisture content, and less crosslink point caused by styrene evaporation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 266)

Pages:

110-114

Citation:

Online since:

October 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Gu, Materials & Design, 30, 4 (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] C.B. Lawrence, C.E. Bakis, V.L. Brown, S.H. Rizkalla, T.C. Triantafillou, J.F. Davalos, E. Cosenza, J.J. Lesko, and A. Machida, Journal of Composites for Construction, 6, 2 (2002).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73)

Google Scholar

[3] Z.K. Awad, T. Aravinthan, and Y. Zhuge, Construction and Building Materials, 37, (2012).

Google Scholar

[4] R. Burgueño, M.J. Quagliata, G.M. Mehta, A.K. Mohanty, M. Misra, and L.T. Drzal, Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 13, 2 (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Gao, J. Chen, Z. Zhang, and D. Fox, Composite Structures, 96, (2013).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Chieruzzi, A. Miliozzi, and J.M. Kenny, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 45, (2013).

Google Scholar

[7] M. George, G.E. Kochimoolayil, and H. Jayadas Narakathra, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 133, 13 (2016).

Google Scholar

[8] D. Romanzini, A.A. Silva, B.G. Soares, A.J. Zattera, and S.C. Amico, Journal of Composite Materials, 51, 2 (2016).

Google Scholar

[9] D. Romanzini, F. Cuttica, A. Frache, A.J. Zattera, and S.C. Amico, Polymer Composites, (2015).

Google Scholar

[10] P. Jawahar, R. Gnanamoorthy, and M. Balasubramanian, Wear, 261, 7–8 (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] X. Yu, C. Wei, D. Xu, C. Lu, J. Yu, and S. Lu, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 103, 6 (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] Kusmono and Z. Arifin Mohd Ishak, International Journal of Polymer Science, 2013, (2013).

Google Scholar

[13] Y.J.V. Ruban, S.G. Mon, and D.V. Roy, Polymer Science Series A, 56, 6 (2014).

Google Scholar

[14] S. Şen, Polymer Composites, 31, 3 (2010).

Google Scholar

[15] M. Ahmadi, M.R. Moghbeli, and M.M. Shokrieh, Iranian Polymer Journal, 21, 12 (2012).

Google Scholar

[16] N. Rajini, J.T. Winowlin Jappes, C. Rajakarunakaran, and I. Siva, Nano Hybrids, 2, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/nh.2.87

Google Scholar

[17] K. Kanny and T.P. Mohan, Composites Part B: Engineering, 58, (2014).

Google Scholar

[18] K. Dean, L. Yu, and D.Y. Wu, Composites Science and Technology, 67, 3–4 (2007).

Google Scholar

[19] A. Rivera-Gonzaga, A. Sanchez-Solis, G. Sanchez-Olivares, F. Calderas, and O. Manero, Journal of Polymer Engineering, 32, 1 (2012).

DOI: 10.1515/polyeng-2011-0118

Google Scholar

[20] N. Sombatsompop, K. Chaochanchaikul, C. Phromchirasuk, and S. Thongsang, Polymer International, 52, 12 (2003).

Google Scholar

[21] E.M.S. Sanchez, C.A.C. Zavaglia, and M.I. Felisberti, Polymer, 41, 2 (2000).

Google Scholar