Crack Resistance Increase of Bushings while Assembling Joints with Tension

Abstract:

In order to restore worn parts during repair work, it is often used to press the repair bushings. While assembling joints, cracks may form in the spanning part (bushing), as it may have surface and structure defects. Therefore, an urgent task is to increase the crack resistance of joints with tension during its assembly. The paper examines the influence of the geometry of the spanning part on the process of cracking. To assess the effect of defects on the crack formation, the method of modeling defects with a surface crack of a semi elliptical shape was used. The crack resistance is estimated using the force criterion of fracture mechanics – the stress intensity coefficient. As a result, it was found that the ratio between the wall thickness of the enclosing sleeve and its outer diameter has a significant effect on the crack resistance of the joint with tension, which allows reducing the origin probability and crack development during its pressing by varying these parameters. While assembling joints, the following methods are often used: mechanical-using a press and thermal with heating of the covering part. When the method of joint with cooling of the covered part, the greatest strength of the joint is achieved, but the probability of cracking increases. This is because when the temperature of the enclosing sleeve decreases in contact with the cooled shaft, the critical stress intensity coefficient (fracture toughness), which is a mechanical characteristic of crack resistance, decreases. To reduce the effect of cooling the sleeve, you can use a combined method of assembling the joint, in which the covered part is cooled and the covering part is heated. It is shown that to assess the fracture resistance at low temperatures, it is optimal to conduct full-scale tests, where the cooling and heating temperatures of the press joint parts are the experimental factors.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 313)
• Pages: 22-30
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.313.22
• Online since: January 2021
• Authors: S.D. Popov*, G.V. Redreev, A.N. Sorokin, A.V. Shimokhin, V.M. Pomogaev
• Keywords: Contact Pressure, Crack Resistance, Critical Temperature, Semi-Elliptical Crack, Stress, Stress Intensity Coefficient, Tension Joint

References

[1] Redreev G.V., Evstifeev V.V., Rusanov A.N., Evseev Yu.A. Reliability of landing with tightness while restoring the cover of the turbocharger housing. Omsk: Bulletin of Siberian State Automobile and Road University, –№2(42), -2015. – pp.37-40.

[2] Redreev G. V., Popov S. D., Redreev P. G., Rusanov A. N. Reliability of thin-walled parts in tight landings // Modern problems of science and education. – 2015. – № 1; URL: www.science-education.ru/125-19749 (request date: 10.04.2017).

[3] Riazantseva I. L. Theory and design of joints with guaranteed tension. - Omsk: Omsk State Technical University Publishing House, 2015. – p.161.

[4] Popov, S.D. Ensuring the reliability of joints with tightness by preventing cracking/Popov S.D., Sorokin A. N., Zimin A. K., Bachinin A. A. / in the collection: Scientific and technical support of the agro-industrial complex, state and prospects of development. Collection of the II International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 25th anniversary of the Omsk state UNIVERSITY IN the status of a University. 2019. - Pp. 217-223.

[5] Makhutov N. A. Resistance of structural elements to brittle destruction. - M.: Mechanical Engineering, 1973. – p.201.

[6] Matvienko Yu. G. Models and criteria of fracture mechanics. – M.: FIZMATLIT, 2006. – p.328.

[7] Handbook of stress intensity coefficients. In 2 volumes. / Translated from English. Ed. by Yu. Murakami. - Moscow: Mir, (1990).

[8] Hellan K. Introduction to the mechanics of destruction: / Translated from English - M.: Mir, 1988. – p.364.

[9] Makhutov N. A. Deformational criteria of destruction and calculation of structural elements for strength. - Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1981. – p.272.

[10] Leonov V. P., Vasiliev A. K. Development of approaches to normalization of technological defects of welded joints of structures for various purposes. //Questions of material science. – 2007. – №3(51). – pp.187-203.

[11] Skvortsov Yu. V., Glushkov S. V. Modeling of non-transparent surface cracks in thin-walled structures. Bulletin of Saratov State Agrarian University. – 2011. – №3(27). – Part 4. Pp. 187-191.

[12] Glushkov S. V., Skvortsov Yu. V., Perov S. N. Comparison of the results of solving the problem of fracture mechanics for a pipe with a non-through crack. Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 2014, No. 3, pp.36-46.

DOI: 10.15593/perm.mech/2014.3.03

[13] Perov, S. N., Skvortsov Yu. V., Chapurin K. A. Stress intensity factors for pipes with non-through cracks. // News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 10. – №3. – 2008. – Pp. 905-910.

[14] Handbook on the resistance of materials. / Pisarenko G. S., Yakovlev A. P., Matveev V. V. //; Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1988 – p.736.

[15] Broek D. Fundamentals of fracture mechanics. / Translated from English. – M.: Higher school, 1980. – p.368.

[16] Arshinov, V.D. Maintenance of engines YaMZ-240, YaMZ-240N, YaMZ-240B / V.D. Arshinov, V.K. Zorin, G.I. Sozinov. – Moscow, Transport, 1978. – 310 p.