Effect of Current Density Distribution in the Zinc Plating Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an analysis of the current density distribution in the zinc plating process, using a two-dimension approach. The simulation presents a model based on COMSOL Multi-physics software. The simulation neglected the effect of mass transfer and production of gaseous species, in order to simplify the resolution. Additionally, a validation from the simulation through a comparison with the experimental data at similar conditions was performed. The results presented a good agreement between the experimental and simulated data. The graphics from both approaches showed a decreasing trend in the current density along the cathode length. This trend arises from the electrons movement in the electrodes; electrons flow through the least resistive path. Given the fact that zinc electroplating incurs an important industrial application, simulation is becoming a promising way to optimization and improvement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 316)

Pages:

839-844

Citation:

Online since:

April 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Gül, F. Kilic, S. Aslan, Characteristics of electro-co-deposited Ni–Al2O3 nano-particle reinforced metal matrix composite (MMC) coatings, Journal Slevier. 2009 (267):976–990.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.022

Google Scholar

[2] L. Chen, L. Wang, Z. Zeng, Effect of surfactant on the electrodeposition and wear resistance of Ni–Al2O3 composite coatings, J. Materials Science and Engineering.2006 (434):319–325.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.098

Google Scholar

[3] S. Kannaiyan, A. Gopal*, Corrosion inhibition using nanomaterials - an overview, International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Education. 2016, 160-170.

Google Scholar

[4] L.Yong Ng, A. Wahab Mohammad, C. Peng Leo, Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: A comprehensive review, Journal of Desalination. 2013, 15–33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.033

Google Scholar

[5] H. Park, K. Han, J. Lee and J. Shim, Numerical Simulation of Zinc Flow and Temperature Distribution in a Galvanizing Zinc Pot, ISIJ International.2008 (48): 224–229.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.48.224

Google Scholar

[6] T. Schauer, A. Joos, L. Dulog, C.D. Eisenbach, Protection of iron against corrosion with polyaniline primers, J. Progress in Organic Coatings.1998 (33): 20–27.

DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9440(97)00123-9

Google Scholar

[7] D. G. Shchukin, S. V. Lamaka, K. A. Yasakau, M. L. Zheludkevich, Active Anticorrosion Coatings with Halloysite Nanocontainers, J. Phys. Chem. C., 2008 (112): 958-964.

DOI: 10.1021/jp076188r

Google Scholar

[8] S.R. Natarajan, Current efficiency and electrochemical equivalent in an electrolytic process, Bulletin of Electrochemistry. 1985, 215-216.

Google Scholar

[9] G. W. Barton, A. C. Scott, A validated mathematical model for a zinc electrowinning cell, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry.1992 (22):104-115.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01023811

Google Scholar

[10] T. Widayatno, Modelling and Simulation of current distribution of nickel electrodeposition from low electrolyte concentration at a narrow interelectrode gap, Asian Research Publishing Network. 2016, 5183-5189.

DOI: 10.1063/1.4938338

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Zhang, J.M. Werner and M. L. Free1, Modeling Zinc Electrowinning for Current Efficiency Prediction Based on Nernst-Plank Equation and Electrode Gas Evolution Reaction Kinetics, Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2018, 3246-3252.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0321815jes

Google Scholar

[12] K. Bouzek, K. Borve, O. A. Lorentsen, and K. Osmundsen, Current Distribution at the Electrodes in Zinc Electrowinning Cells, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1995 (142):64-69.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2043939

Google Scholar

[13] A. Mahapatro, S. Kumar Suggu, Modeling and simulation of electrodeposition: Effect of electrolyte current density and conductivity on electroplating thickness, J. Advanced Materials Science.2018 (3):1-9.

DOI: 10.15761/ams.1000143

Google Scholar

[14] N. Obaid, R. Sivakumaran, J. Lui, and A. Okunade, Modelling the Electroplating of Hexavalent Chromium, Extract from the Proceedings of the 2013 COMSOL Conference in Boston, USA. (2013).

Google Scholar

[15] L. Bengoa, P. Pary, P.R. Seré, Dendritic Zinc Growth in Acid Electrolyte: Effect of the pH, J. Dendritic Zinc growth in acid electrolyte: Effect of the pH, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2018 (27):1102-1108.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-018-3139-7

Google Scholar

[16] S. Selverston, R. F. Savinell, J. S. Wainrigh, Zinc-Iron Flow Batteries with Common Electrolyte, J. Advancing solid state and electrochemical science technology.167 (2020):1069-1075.

Google Scholar

[18] B. Kativna, P. Santosh, M. Renukadevi, Role of organic additives on zinc plating, Journal Surface and Coatings Technology.2006 (201):3438–3442.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.235

Google Scholar

[19] P. Pary, J.F. Bengoa, M.S, Conconi, Influence of organic additives on the behaviour of zinc electroplating from alkaline cyanide-free electrolyte, The International Journal of Surface Engineering and Coatings.2017 (95):83-89.

DOI: 10.1080/00202967.2016.1237711

Google Scholar

[20] M.C. Wu, T.S. Zhao, L. Wei, Improved electrolyte for zinc-bromine flow batteries, Journal of Power Sources. 2018 (384): 232–239.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.006

Google Scholar