Predicting Effective Parameters in Cyclic Behavior of Reinforced Masonry Walls with Shotcrete Using Artificial Neural Networks

Article Preview

Abstract:

In Masonry buildings, walls are the main structural elements resistant to lateral loads. Reinforcing masonry walls by shotcreting one- or two-sides is one of the most common reinforcement methods. Considering the economic losses and casualties caused by damage to these elements in previous earthquakes, it is necessary to investigate the seismic behavior of these walls. The existing data can train artificial neural networks, and the behaviors could be generalized for future cases. In this study, the prediction of cyclic behavior parameters of reinforced masonry walls with one- and two-way shotcrete is investigated using different artificial neural network methods. Input parameters of the neural network include length, thickness, height, mortar shear strength, mortar compressive strength, mesh type, spring dimensions, rebar diameter, average thickness of shotcrete, and concrete compressive strength. Output parameters were the relative displacement of yield, relative displacement corresponding to maximum resistance, final relative displacement, yield strength, displacement resistance corresponding to maximum resistance, ultimate resistance, and initial stiffness. The results showed that the feed-forward back-propagation neural network could accurately predict the examined output parameters compared to other models, which can be considered as an alternative to some time-consuming and costly laboratory and analytical investigations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 329)

Pages:

71-78

Citation:

Online since:

March 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Ghiassi, M Soltani Mohamadi, A.A Tasnimi, Linear Homogenization and Mechanical Characterization of Strengthened Masonry Elements with Concrete Overlay, Journal of civil and surveying engineering. Volume 45 (Issue 4) (2011) 455-466. (in Persian).

Google Scholar

[2] Improvement Network brick walls with steel and concrete lining. (2011) Tehran: (Poly Copy) (in Persian).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Kalali, M.Z. Kabir, Out-of-Plane Performance Based on Homogenization & Micromechanics Approach, Journal of civil and surveying engineering. Volume 45(Issue 2) (2011) 203-217. (in Persian).

Google Scholar

[4] E.S Hashemi, Numerical investigation of the behaviour of masonry walls reinforced with shotcrete, Master's degree in earthquake engineering. Road, Housing & Urban Development Research Center, Institute of Building and Housing. (2013).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Larbi, H. G. Harris, Seismic Performance of Low Aspect Ratio Reinforced Block Masonry Shear Walls.Proceeding of Fourth U.S, National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 2 (2013).

Google Scholar

[6] B. Ghiass, M.M Soltani, A.A Tasnimi, A Simplified Model for Analysis of Unreinforced Masonry ShearWalls under Axial, Shear and Flexural Loading, Engineering Structure, Science Direct. Vol.42 (2012) 396-409.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.002

Google Scholar

[7] E.S Hashemi, A S. Moghadam, N. K.A Attari, S.A. Hashemi, Study the relative contribution of materials, reinforcement and concrete layers at different levels of cyclic deformation of masonry walls reinforced with shotcrete, Journal of structural and construction engineering.vol5 no 2 (2017) 22-39.

Google Scholar

[8] A.Cascardi, F.Micelli, M.A. Aiello, Analytical model based on artificial neural network for masonry shear walls strengthened with FRM systems, Composites Part B: Engineering Volume 95 (2016) 252-263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.066

Google Scholar

[9] P.G., Asteris, V.Plevris, Anisotropic masonry failure criterion using artificial neural networks, Neural Comput & Applic.28 (2017) 2207–2229.

DOI: 10.1007/s00521-016-2181-3

Google Scholar

[10] Q. Zhou, F. Zhu, X. Yang, F. Wang, B. Chi, Z. Zhang, Shear capacity estimation of fully grouted reinforced concrete masonry walls using neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system models, Construction and Building Materials. Volume 153 (2017) Pages 937-947.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.171

Google Scholar

[11] R. Hung, Artificial Neural Network Model for Analysis of In-Plane Shear Strength of Partially Grouted Masonry Shear Walls. University of Alberta.

Google Scholar

[12] O. Onat, M. Gul, Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the prediction of out-of-plane response of infill walls subjected to shake table, Smart Structures Systems. Vol. 21, No. 4 (2018) 521-535.

Google Scholar

[13] P.G Asteris. et al. Masonry Compressive Strength Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks. In: Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage. TMM_CH, Communications in Computer and Information Science. vol 962 (2018).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12960-6_14

Google Scholar

[14] N. Pitchaipillai, S.K Paramasivam, Deep neural network‐based mechanical behavior analysis for various masonry infill walls with hybrid fiber mortar, Journal of the fib. Volume20, Issue6 (2019) 1974-1985.

DOI: 10.1002/suco.201900064

Google Scholar

[15] K. Suzuki, Artificial Neural Networks: Methodological Advances and Biomedical Applications. Rijeka: (2011) InTech, 1-362.

Google Scholar

[16] Z.H Tang, R. Li, An Improved Neural Network Model and Its Applications. Journal of Information & Computational Science. 10 (2011) 1881–1888.

Google Scholar

[17] Goodfellow, Bengio & Courville 2016, p.200, The back-propagation algorithm (Rumelhart et al., 1986a), often simply called backprop.

Google Scholar

[18] Goodfellow, Bengio & Courville 2016, p.200, Furthermore, back-propagation is often misunderstood as being specific to multi-layer neural networks, but in principle it can compute derivatives of any function,.

Google Scholar

[19] Goodfellow, Bengio & Courville 2016, p.214, This table-filling strategy is sometimes called dynamic programming.,.

Google Scholar