Search results

Furthermore, the area ratio of peak2 to 1 was also measured at 24 h、36 h and 48 h, which was 1：5.98, 1：2.43 and 1：1.51 respectively.
Rank 1 2.5 2.5 4 5.5 5.5 Ratio of peak 2 to peak1 0 approximately equal to 0 1:42.71 1:5.98 1:2.436 1:1.51 Rank 1.5 1.5 3 4 5 6 d -0.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 -0.5 d2 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.25 0.25 2 Discussion.
So we could judge that peak 1 refer to the intracellular water.
References [1] L.
Vol.43 (1978) , pp. 479-498

According to the national standard test methods, each specimen is tested, and test data is shown from Table 1 to Table 3.
Table 1 The apparent density of natural fine aggregate and recycled fine aggregate samples the quality of drying sample G0(g) the total quality of sample, water and bottle G1(g) the total quality of water and bottle G2(g) apparent density ρ0(kg/m3) test value average natural fine aggregate sample 1 300 864 678 2608.7 2610 sample 2 300 825 640 2608.7 recycled fine aggregate sample 1 300 817 648 2290.1 2300 sample 2 300 832 662 2307.7 Remarks: apparent density is calculated by the follow formula (1):
(1) ρw stands for water density, which is1000kg/m3.
Table 3 The water absorption of natural fine aggregate and recycled fine aggregate samples the total quality of saturated surface dry simple G1(g) the total quality of simple after dryingG2(g) water absorption w (%) test value average natural fine aggregate sample 1 500 479 4.38 4.3 sample 2 500 480 4.17 recycled fine aggregate sample 1 500 431 16.01 16.0 sample 2 500 431 16.01 Remarks: Taking the dry sample as a benchmark, water absorption is calculated by formula (4):
References [1] M.Etxeberria, E.Vazquez, A.Mari, and M.Barra[2007].

From 1 to 5 layers in Fig. 1 are the center 1 layer and underside 4 layers of TiB2 model, and other upside 4 layers can be found by operation by the symmetry of D6h point group with Ti1 (Ti of classes 1) at the origin (Fig. 1).
The representative atom of each class is shown in Fig. 1.
The net charges of every model are shown in Table 1.
References [1] M.
Alloys Compounds Vol. 479 (2009), p. 803 [4] D.Q.

The pit size and number of non coated Co-Cr alloy is severely attacked along with grain boundaries Centrifugal casting� High frequency induction casting Vacuum pressure casting Non (TiN) A alloy� B alloy C alloy A alloy B alloy C alloy A alloy B alloy C alloy I corr (A/�)� 1.88X10-7 (7.49X10-6) 1.42X10-6 (1.19X10-6)� 5.13X10-7 (8.14X10-6)� 1.65X10-7 (1.50X10-6)� 6.62X10-7 (5.93X10-7)� 1.39X10-7 (7.81X10-6)� 1.81X10-7 (6.78X10-6)� 8.87X10-7 (7.14X10-8)� 1.20X10-7 (6.80X10-6)� I 300m V (A/�)� 1.06X10-6 (9.00X10-5)� 1.65X10-1 (8.64X10-5) 1.80X10-4 (1.20X10-4) 3.35X10-4 (2.24X10-6) 4.26XX10-2 (7.22X10-5) 1.09X10-4 (2.90X10-5) 4.19X10-4 (6.00X10-5) 2.58X10-2 (6.89X10-5) 1.43X10-4 (5.00X10-5) E corr (mV)� -461 (-422) -373 (-330) -401 (-394) -381 (-289) -287 (-355) -475 (-261) -444 (-245) -268 (-260) - 436 (-309) E pit (mV)� +720 (+830)� +130 (+150) +740 (+900)
References [1] BR Lanier, KD Rudd, RR Strunk: J.
Tech Vol 91(1997), p 1
Shreir, Corrosion Handbook Vol.1, Newnes-Butterworths Boston, (1979), p.3-31 [16] H.
Vol. 475-479 (2005), p.2287

The XRD patterns show that the increase in intensity of (1 1 0) plane are more notable than that of (1 0 10) and (0 0 15) plane.
According to the pole figures of (0 0 6) plane and (1 1 0) plane, the increased intensity of the (1 1 0) plane is favorable to improve the thermoelectric performance [15,16].
The electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity of hot extruded specimens are shown in Fig. 4. 20 30 40 50 60 Intensity (arb. unit) Cu (Kα ) 48 h 72 h 100 h 145 h 195 h (0 0 15) (0 2 10) (2 0 5) (1 1 0) (1 0 10) (0 1 5) 2θ (Deg ree) Figure 1.
It is also observed in the SEM fractographs 20 30 40 50 60 annealed annealed as-bulk as-bulk parallel perpoendicular (0 2 10) (2 0 5) (0 0 15) (1 0 10) (1 1 0) (0 1 5) Cu (Kα) Intensity (arb. unit) 2θ (Degree) Figure. 6.
Forum 475-479 (2005) p.1759 [11] K.Wakamura: J.

Summary and Conclusions 1.
W911NF-05-1-0046.
References [1] R.Z.
Kopylov, Russian Metall. 1 (1981), p. 99
Forum 475-479 (2005), p.2949

(1) 1 n jEK j j ji i i F X G  
As can be seen from Eq.8 that the mass jm~ of equivalent SDOF system (Fig.3) is ji n i i T j j Xm MXm   1 }1]{[}{~
References [1] M.S.Medhekar, D.J.L.
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.30(2001),pp:467-479 [3] Timothy White, Perry Adebar.
Journal of Building Structures, Vol.28 (2007)No.1,pp:101-106.

The results are listed in Table 1.
Prod.Eng.Res.Devel. 2007(1)：149-15
Annals of the CIRP. 2007,56(1)：269-272
Engineering Failure Analysis, 2009, 16(1)：128-135.
Computer Aided Engineering, 2007, 1(1):85-89 [16] Zhuang Bai-liang, Shan Zhong-de, Jiang Chao, Rong Wen-juan.

Table 1.
Three zones numbered from 1 to 3 are delimited to extract cores (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Vol. 18, Issue 1, 2023
July, pp. 479–486, 2018

Floors: 1 floor and 1 ground floor.
Fig. 1.
The following inputs have been used: Table 1.
References [1] A.S.
Vol. 1.