Search results

Fig. 1 Schematic view of Ag-Zn alloy internal oxidation process Internal oxidation.
Schematic view of Ag-Zn alloy internal oxidation process is shown in Fig. 1.
(1) Application of nanotechnology.
References [1] C.P.
Yang, et al, Effect of preparing method of ZnO powders on electrical arc erosion behavior of Ag/ZnO electrical contact material, Journal of Materials Research. 31 (2016) 468-479

Jiang[23] studied the effect of austenite grain size on the martensite transformation in 1.0C-1.5Cr-0.3Mn0.3Si-Fe high carbon steel.
The atomic ratio of Si and C in the SiC particles in the SiC/Fe-3Cu-C and SiC/Fe-3Cu-0.5Mo-C materials was 3:1 and 2:1, respectively.
The enhanced relationship was expressed as Eq. 8[52]: σc0=σm0(1+fd)(1+f1)
References [1] E.
Mater. 479(2019)43-49

The parameter l0 was determined experimentally from the plot of 1/(n2-1) versus 1/l2.
References [1] E.
Solids 279 (2001) 1
Phys. 70 (1991) 1
Solids 330 (2003) 1

Carpenter, Jr.1, Jennifer Jackman2, Naiyi Li3, Richard J.
April 2004 Figure 1.
Cradle Bottom View Table 1.
References [1] J.R., D.J.
Verma, Fifth Pacific Rim International Materials Conference PRIM5, Beijing, China, Nov 2004, Materials Science Forum, 475-479 (2005) pp. 559-562

Table 1.
σ (N) = σmax + (UTSB – σmax) · (1 – (NA – 1) / (NA + B))C [53]
Goodman approximation: σa, R-1 = (σa, R0.1 * kf) / (1 – ((σm, R0.1 * kf) / UTSB)) [61], (2) Elliptical relationship: σa, R-1 = (σa, R0.1 * kf) / (1 – ((σm, R0.1 * kf) / UTSB)²)0.5 [62], (3) Gerber parabola: σa, R-1 = (σa, R0.1 * kf) / (1 – ((σm, R0.1 * kf) / UTSB)²) [63] and (4) Bagci formula: σa, R-1 = (σa, R0.1 * kf) / (1 – ((σm, R0.1 * kf) / YSB, 0.2%)4) [60]
References [1] J.W.
Rep. 8 (2018) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19449-0

rendering 20 0,9900 5 Foamed PU 5 0,0500 6 Window frame 90 0,1220 7 Glass 4 1,0000 8 Gas stratum between glass panels 16 0,0206 Number of window position Distance of window from inner edge of the wall [mm] Heat conductivity derived from 2D calculation L2D [W/(m.K)] Linear loss coefficient y [W/(m.K)] 1 0 1,0678 0,066 2 10 1,0615 0,059 3 20 1,0565 0,054 4 30 1,0525 0,051 5 40 1,0491 0,047 6 50 1,0462 0,044 7 60 1,0438 0,042 8 70 1,0417 0,040 9 80 1,0399 0,038 10 90 1,0384 0,036 11 100 1,0372 0,035 12 110 1,0362 0,034 13 120 1,0353 0,033 14 130 1,0347 0,033 15 140 1,0343 0,032 16 150 1,0341 0,032 17 160 1,0341 0,032 18 170 1,0342 0,032 19 180 1,0345 0,032 20 190 1,0350 0,033 21 200 1,0357 0,034 22 210 1,0366 0,035 23 220 1,0378 0,036 24 230 1,0391 0,037 25 240 1,0408 0,039 26 250 1,0427 0,041 27 260 1,0451 0,043 28 270 1,0479 0,046 29 280 1,0511 0,049 30 290 1,0551 0,053 31 300 1,0638 0,062 32 315 1,0696 0,068 Table 3. – Relation of y to the possition of window in wall with heat
TI reveals 70 mm L2D W/(m.K) y W/(m.K) L2D W/(m.K) y W/(m.K) L2D W/(m.K) y W/(m.K) L2D W/(m.K) y W/(m.K) L2D W/(m.K) y W/(m.K) L2D W/(m.K) y W/(m.K) 1 0 1,2912 0,189 1,2540 0,152 1,2196 0,118 1,2091 0,107 1,1939 0,092 1,1820 0,080 2 10 1,2761 0,174 1,2401 0,138 1,2156 0,114 1,1964 0,094 1,1817 0,080 1,1703 0,068 3 20 1,2673 0,165 1,2327 0,131 1,2091 0,107 1,1906 0,089 1,1728 0,071 1,1653 0,063 4 30 1,2603 0,158 1,2270 0,125 1,2043 0,102 1,1864 0,084 1,1673 0,065 1,1621 0,060 5 40 1,2551 0,153 1,2230 0,121 1,2011 0,099 1,1839 0,082 1,1640 0,062 1,1604 0,058 6 50 1,2487 0,147 1,2178 0,116 1,1967 0,095 1,1800 0,078 1,1613 0,059 1,1574 0,055 7 60 1,2421 0,140 1,2127 0,111 1,1924 0,090 1,1763 0,074 1,1580 0,056 1,1544 0,052 8 70 1,2365 0,134 1,2081 0,106 1,1885 0,086 1,1732 0,071 1,1575 0,056 1,1520 0,050 9 80 1,2306 0,129 1,2033 0,101 1,1844 0,082 1,1694 0,067 1,1580 0,056 1,1491 0,047 10 90 1,2249 0,123 1,2009 0,099 1,1806 0,079 1,1686 0,067 1,1575 0,056 1,1489
0,047 11 100 1,2195 0,117 1,1965 0,094 1,1791 0,077 1,1654 0,063 1,1547 0,053 1,1464 0,044 12 110 1,2141 0,112 1,1924 0,090 1,1732 0,071 1,1626 0,061 1,1524 0,050 1,1444 0,042 13 120 1,2089 0,107 1,1880 0,086 1,1696 0,068 1,1593 0,057 1,1495 0,048 1,1419 0,040 14 130 1,2037 0,102 1,1837 0,082 1,1662 0,064 1,1563 0,054 1,1469 0,045 1,1395 0,038 15 140 1,1986 0,097 1,1802 0,078 1,1628 0,061 1,1540 0,052 1,1450 0,043 1,1379 0,036 16 150 1,1937 0,092 1,1758 0,074 1,1597 0,058 1,1508 0,049 1,1422 0,040 1,1355 0,034 17 160 1,1885 0,086 1,1717 0,070 1,1559 0,054 1,1479 0,046 1,1397 0,038 1,1334 0,031 18 170 1,1833 0,081 1,1677 0,066 1,1529 0,051 1,1453 0,043 1,1375 0,036 1,1315 0,029 19 180 1,1781 0,076 1,1641 0,062 1,1497 0,048 1,1430 0,041 1,1357 0,034 1,1300 0,028 20 190 1,1729 0,071 1,1597 0,058 1,1465 0,045 1,1400 0,038 1,1331 0,031 1,1277 0,026 21 200 1,1675 0,065 1,1586 0,057 1,1485 0,046 1,1402 0,038 1,1337 0,032 1,1286 0,027 22 210 1,1619 0,060 1,1497 0,048 1,1404 0,038 1,1326 0,031
1,1266 0,025 1,1220 0,020 23 220 1,1563 0,054 1,1456 0,044 1,1374 0,035 1,1302 0,028 1,1247 0,023 1,1205 0,018 24 230 1,1508 0,049 1,1418 0,040 1,1345 0,033 1,1284 0,026 1,1234 0,021 1,1194 0,017 25 240 1,1445 0,043 1,1373 0,035 1,1312 0,029 1,1256 0,024 1,1212 0,019 1,1177 0,016 26 250 1,1384 0,036 1,1326 0,031 1,1275 0,026 1,1227 0,021 1,1189 0,017 1,1159 0,014 27 260 1,1336 0,032 1,1289 0,027 1,1247 0,023 1,1206 0,019 1,1174 0,015 1,1147 0,013 28 270 1,1291 0,027 1,1253 0,023 1,1219 0,020 1,1185 0,016 1,1158 0,014 1,1136 0,012 29 280 1,1257 0,024 1,1225 0,021 1,1198 0,018 1,1172 0,015 1,1150 0,013 1,1132 0,011 30 290 1,1235 0,021 1,1211 0,019 1,1190 0,017 1,1169 0,015 1,1153 0,013 1,1139 0,012 31 300 1,1232 0,021 1,1215 0,019 1,1202 0,018 1,1190 0,017 1,1181 0,016 1,1173 0,015 32 315 1,1220 0,020 1,1220 0,020 1,1220 0,020 1,1220 0,020 1,1220 0,020 1,1220 0,020 Table 4. – Relation of y to the window possition in wall with heat cladding U = 0,31 W/(m2.K), Uw= 1,2 W/(m2.K) Comsidered
0,067 11 100 1,2463 0,161 1,2126 0,128 1,1886 0,104 1,1713 0,086 1,1580 0,073 1,1478 0,063 12 110 1,2359 0,151 1,2047 0,120 1,1800 0,095 1,1659 0,081 1,1532 0,068 1,1437 0,059 13 120 1,2254 0,140 1,1969 0,112 1,1735 0,089 1,1606 0,076 1,1487 0,064 1,1397 0,055 14 130 1,2147 0,130 1,1884 0,103 1,1666 0,082 1,1547 0,070 1,1436 0,059 1,1352 0,050 15 140 1,2041 0,119 1,1797 0,095 1,1602 0,075 1,1490 0,064 1,1387 0,054 1,1308 0,046 16 150 1,1928 0,108 1,1720 0,087 1,1535 0,069 1,1434 0,058 1,1346 0,050 1,1272 0,042 17 160 1,1817 0,097 1,1639 0,079 1,1468 0,062 1,1387 0,054 1,1300 0,045 1,1233 0,038 18 170 1,1705 0,085 1,1554 0,070 1,1410 0,056 1,1330 0,048 1,1252 0,040 1,1190 0,034 19 180 1,1589 0,074 1,1471 0,062 1,1345 0,049 1,1277 0,043 1,1206 0,036 1,1150 0,030 20 190 1,1474 0,062 1,1385 0,053 1,1277 0,043 1,1220 0,037 1,1157 0,031 1,1108 0,026 21 200 1,1366 0,052 1,1299 0,045 1,1225 0,038 1,1160 0,031 1,1106 0,026 1,1061 0,021 22 210 1,1275 0,042 1,1206 0,036 1,1143 0,029 1,1086 0,024

(a) wT=1, wL=0, and θ =1/3.
(a) wT=1, wL=0.5, and θ =1/3.
(b) wT=1, wL=1, and θ =1/2.
From Eqns. 22, 25, and 20, we obtain Tc(1/3): (1/3) (1/3) (1/9) (1/3) (1/3) [ln(1/3) (2/ 3)ln 2] T L c B u w w T s k ∞ ∞ + ≈ ≈ − +
Vol. 479 (2001), p. 43 [11] F.

Contents of Paper 1.
Table 1.
Ammonium nitrate Urea Molar Ratio Flame colour Duration of flame in Sec. 1. 12 4 1:0.33 Fent-Yellow 12 2. 12 8 1:0.66 Yellow 20 3. 12 10 1:0.83 Dark-Yellow 30 4. 12 12 1:1 Fent-Orange 35 5. 12 14.4 1:1.2 Orange 35 6. 12 18 1:1.5 Orange-Red 36 7. 12 24 1:2 Orange-Red 40 The rare earth doped Y2O3 by using different fuels synthesized via CS is useful for different application.
Alloys Compd. 479 (2009) 772–776
B. 72 (2005) 1-5

Table 1.
The upward curvature 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0 10 20 30  (MPa)  (%) 1 2 3 1,76 1,77 1,78 1,79 1,80 1,81 1,82 1,83 1,84 1 2 3 1,93 1,94 log [Er(t) (MPa)] log [t(s)] indicates a continuous increase in its elastic modulus, which is characteristic of elastomers that loose their stiffness as the polymer chains deform.
Nanoparticle Res., 1, 1 (1999)
Rev. 1, 243 (1994)
Soc (London) A319, 479 (1970) [56] J.

Table of Contents 1.
Properties of Oxide Nanomaterials 2.1.1.
Gas-Solid Transformation Methods 2.2.1.1.
Applications 2.3.1.
Growth 240(2002) 479-483