Study of the Heat and Mass Transfer in a Dehumidification of Liquid Desiccant

Article Preview

Abstract:

Desiccant systems have been proposed as energy saving alternatives to vapor compression air conditioning for handling the latent load. Desiccants are classified as either liquid or solid. The main components for a liquid desiccant system are the dehumidification and regeneration towers. This paper presents the results from a study of the performance of a packed tower absorber for lithium chloride desiccant dehumidification system. A finite difference model was developed to determine the packing height of the dehumidification towers. The finite difference model was written in MATLAB language which is a suitable model to measure the optimum height of a tower. The paper also examines the effects of different design parameters on the height of a packed tower using a mathematical model. The effects of air and liquid flow rates, air humidity, desiccant temperature and concentration were reported on the packing height and humidity effectiveness of the column. In conclusion the results of the present study are compared with previous experimental studies.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

120-126

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ASHRAE (2008) Handbook–HVAC Systems and Equipment, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air–Conditioning Engineers, Inc.

Google Scholar

[2] Daou, K., Wang, R.Z., Xia, Z.Z. (2006) Desiccant cooling air conditioning: a review. Renew & Sust. Energy Rev., 10, 55-77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.010

Google Scholar

[3] Roth, K.W., Westphalen, D., Dieckmann, J., Hamilton, S. D, and Goetzler, W. (2005), Energy Consumption Characteristics of Commercial Building HVAC Systems Volume III: Energy Savings Potential.

Google Scholar

[4] Treybal R.E. (1981) Mass Transfer Operations, McGraw –Hill, New York.

Google Scholar

[5] Fumo, N., Goswami, D.Y. (2002) Study of An aqueous Lithium Chloride Desiccant System: Air Dehumidification and Desiccant Regeneration. Solar Energy, Vol. 72, No. 4. pp.351-361.

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-092x(02)00013-0

Google Scholar

[6] Oberg, V., Goswami, D.Y. (1998) Experimental Study of the Heat and Mass Transfer in a Packed Bed Liquid Desiccant Air Dehumidifier. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. Vol. 120. pp.289-297.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2888133

Google Scholar

[7] Mago,P. and Goswami, D.Y. (2003) A Study of the Performance of a Hybrid Liquid Desiccant Cooling System Using Lithium Chloride, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 125, pp.129-131.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1530199

Google Scholar

[8] Min Tu, Cheng-Qin Ren, Long-Ai Zhang, Jian-Wei Shao. (2008) Simulation and analysis of a novel liquid desiccant air-conditioning system, Applied Thermal Engineering.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.12.006

Google Scholar

[9] Gommed, K., Grossman, G. (2007) Experimental investigation of a Liquid desiccant system for solar cooling and dehumidification. Solar Energy, Vol. 81, pp.131-138.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2006.05.006

Google Scholar

[10] Chen X. Y, Li Z. Jiang Y., Qu K.Y. (2006) Analytical solution of adiabatic heat and mass transfer process in packed-type liquid desiccant equipment and its application. Solar Energy, Vol. 80, pp.1509-1516.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2005.12.002

Google Scholar

[11] Yin,Y., Zhang,X. and Chen,Z. (2007).

Google Scholar

0181 Gas Mass Velocity [kg/(s-m2)].

Google Scholar

[1] 513.

Google Scholar

[1] 187.

Google Scholar

[1] 180.

Google Scholar

[1] 176 Inlet Gas Temperature(°C).

Google Scholar

[30] 1.

Google Scholar

[30] 2.

Google Scholar

[29] 9.

Google Scholar

[30] 1.

Google Scholar

[30] 0 Desiccant Concentration(kglicl/kgsol).

Google Scholar

348 Desiccant Mass Velocity[kg/(s-m2)].

Google Scholar

[6] 124.

Google Scholar

[6] 113.

Google Scholar

[6] 272.

Google Scholar

[6] 227.

Google Scholar

[6] 206 Moisture To Remove (%).

Google Scholar

[42] 22.

Google Scholar

[40] 33.

Google Scholar

[44] 19.

Google Scholar

[40] 33.

Google Scholar

[40] 88 Inlet Desiccant Temperature(°C).

Google Scholar

[30] 1.

Google Scholar

[30] 0.

Google Scholar

[30] 3.

Google Scholar

[30] 3.

Google Scholar

[30] 2 TABLE II. Experimental Data Inputs 1 2 3 Humidity Ratio( kgw/kga).

Google Scholar

0111 Gas Mass Velocity [kg/(s-m2)].

Google Scholar

[2] 436.

Google Scholar

[2] 639.

Google Scholar

[2] 842 Inlet Gas Temperature(°C) 26 26 26 Desiccant Concentration(kglicl/kgsol).

Google Scholar

35 Desiccant Mass Velocity[kg/(s-m2)].

Google Scholar

[2] 084.

Google Scholar

[2] 084.

Google Scholar

[2] 084 Moisture To Remove (%).

Google Scholar

[18] 02.

Google Scholar

[19] 82.

Google Scholar

[18] 92 Inlet Desiccant Temperature(°C) 27 27 27 Figure 4. Comparison of the Finite difference Model and Experimental Figure 5. Comparison of the Finite difference Model and Experimental Figure 6. Packing height as a function of percent moisture removed. Figure 7. Packing height as a function of air mass velocity Figure 8. Packing height as a function of inlet desiccant temperature Figure 9. Packing height as a function of inlet desiccant temperature.

DOI: 10.7554/elife.42646.021

Google Scholar