Acetabular Component Deformation under Rim Loading Using Digital Image Correlation and Finite Element Methods

Article Preview

Abstract:

Total hip replacement is a highly successful operation; restoring function and reducing pain in arthritis patients. In recent years, thinner resurfacing acetabular cups have been introduced in order to preserve bone stock and reduce the risk of dislocation. However concerns have been raised that deformation of these cups could adversely affect the lubrication regime of the bearing; leading to equatorial and edge contact, possibly causing the implants to jam. This study aims to assess the amount of deformation which occurs due to the tight peripheral fit experienced during press-fit by applying rim loading to three different designs of acetabular cup: a clinically successful cobalt chrome resurfacing cup, a prototype composite resurfacing cup and a clinically successful polyethylene monobloc cup. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was used to measure the deformation and to validate Finite Element (FE) models. DIC provided a non-contacting method to measure displacement; meaning the load could be increased continuously rather than in steps as in previous studies. The physical testing showed that the cobalt chrome cups were significantly stiffer than the composite prototype and polyethylene cups. The FE models were in good agreement with the experimental results for all three cups and were able to predict the deformation to within 10%. FE models were also created to investigate the effect of cup outside diameter and wall thickness on stiffness under rim loading. Increasing outside diameter resulted in a linear reduction in stiffness for all three materials. Increasing the wall thickness resulted in an exponential increase in cup stiffness. Rim loading an acetabular shell does not accurately simulate the in vivo conditions; however it does provide a simple method for comparing cups made of different materials.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

[1] NJR, National Joint Registry for England and Wales 4th Annual Report. (2008), The Department of Health.

Google Scholar

[2] J.J. Callaghan, The Clinical Results and Basic Science of Total Hip Arthroplasty with PorousCoated Prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 75(2) (1993), pp.299-310.

DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199302000-00020

Google Scholar

[3] C.M. Bellini, F. Galbusera, R.G. Ceroni, and M.T. Raimondi, Loss in Mechanical Contact of Cementless Acetabular Prostheses Due to Post-Operative Weight Bearing: A Biomechanical Model. Medical Engineering & Physics. 29(2) (2007), pp.175-181.

DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.02.008

Google Scholar

[4] L.D.M.D. Dorr, Z.M.D. Wan, and J.M.D. Cohen, Hemispheric Titanium Porous Coated Acetabular Component without Screw Fixation. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 3511998), pp.158-168.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199806000-00019

Google Scholar

[5] K.L. Ong, M.T. Manley, and S.M. Kurtz, Have Contemporary Hip Resurfacing Designs Reached Maturity? A Review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90(Supplement_3) (2008), pp.81-88.

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.h.00574

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Jin, S. Meakins, M. Morlock, P. Parsons, C. Hardaker, M. Flett, and G. Isaac, Deformation of Press-Fitted Metallic Resurfacing Cups. Part 1: Experimental Simulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 220(2) (2006).

DOI: 10.1243/095441105x69150

Google Scholar

[7] A. Kamali, J.T. Daniel, S.F. Javid, M. Youseffi, T. Band, R. Ashton, A. Hussain, C.X. Li, J. Daniel, and D.J.W. McMinn, The Effect of Cup Deflection on Friction in Metal-on-Metal Bearings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90-B(SUPP_III) (2008), p.552-c.

Google Scholar

[8] K.H. Widmer, B. Zurfluh, and E.W. Morscher, Load Transfer and Fixation Mode of Press-Fit Acetabular Sockets. Journal of Arthroplasty. 17(7) (2002), pp.926-935.

DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.34526

Google Scholar

[9] J. Stolk, S.A. Maher, N. Verdonschot, P.J. Prendergast, and R. Huiskes, Can Finite Element Models Detect Clinically Inferior Cemented Hip Implants? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 4092003), p.138.

DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000058882.03274.5e

Google Scholar

[10] J. Stolk, D. Janssen, R. Huiskes, and N. Verdonschot, Finite Element-Based Preclinical Testing of Cemented Total Hip Implants. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 4562007), p.138.

DOI: 10.1097/blo.0b013e31802ba491

Google Scholar

[11] J.R.T. Jeffers, M. Browne, A.B. Lennon, P.J. Prendergast, and M. Taylor, Cement Mantle Fatigue Failure in Total Hip Replacement: Experimental and Computational Testing. Journal of Biomechanics. 40(7) (2007), pp.1525-1533.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.07.029

Google Scholar

[12] Limess. Digital Image Correlation (2008) [cited 2009 30/03/2009]; Available from: www. limess. com.

Google Scholar

[13] K.L. Ong, S. Rundell, I. Liepins, R. Laurent, D. Markel, and S.M. Kurtz, Biomechanical Modeling of Acetabular Component Polyethylene Stresses, Fracture Risk, and Wear Rate Following Press-Fit Implantation. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2009).

DOI: 10.1002/jor.20918

Google Scholar

[14] D. Lecompte, A. Smits, S. Bossuyt, H. Sol, J. Vantomme, D. Van Hemelrijck, and A.M. Habraken, Quality Assessment of Speckle Patterns for Digital Image Correlation. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 44(11) (2006), pp.1132-1145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.10.004

Google Scholar

[15] M. Squire, W.L. Griffin, J.B. Mason, R.D. Peindl, and S. Odum, Acetabular Component Deformation with Press-Fit Fixation. Journal of Arthroplasty. 21(6, Supplement 1) (2006), pp.72-77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.016

Google Scholar