A Low-Cost Stewart Platform for a Radio Telescope

Article Preview

Abstract:

Most hexapods that are currently available on the market are expensive and have extremely high positional and orientation accuracies. Although the positional accuracy is high the viewing angle is limited to 60°. These hexapods are designed with a small viewing angle, as they are not optimised for radio telescopes. The aim of this work is to highlight the various factors that should be considered during the design of a 6-3 Stewart platform for pointing applications. These factors are illustrated by presenting the case study of a small custom hexapod that is designed, built and tested. Modelling of the Platform is performed through the implementation of existing kinematic and dynamic models that could be verified through comparison to simulation results in literature. Components designed for the hexapod include the linear drives, base joints, platform joints, electronic controller and graphical user interface. The design process is documented and design decisions clearly motivated. Performance of the Stewart platform is measured with an inclinometer and the ability of the platform to track a sun simulation path is presented. Specifications which the hexapod is able to achieve include a viewing angle of 120˚±0.3˚ and the ability to carry a payload of 1kg.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

362-370

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ADS International s. r. l. (May 2001). MMTO International Technical Memorandum #01-2 Secondary Mirrors Support M2/F5 Hexapod Design Kinematics Support. Smithsonian Institutions & University of Arizona.

Google Scholar

[2] McInroy, J. E., O'Brien, J. F., & Neat, G. W. 1999. Precise, Fault-Tolerant Pointing Using a Stewart Platform. IEEE/ ASME Transacations of Mechatronics, 4 (1): 91-95.

DOI: 10.1109/3516.752089

Google Scholar

[3] Parallel Kinematics: Hexapods &Tripods, Available at: http: /www. physikinstrumente. com/en/products/hexapod_tripod/hexapod_tripod_selection. php. Retrieved: [2011, February 20].

Google Scholar

[4] Tsai, L. -W. 1999. Robot Analysis: the mechanics of serial and parallel manipulators. NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Google Scholar

[5] Patrick M. Koch, Michael Kesteven, Hiroaki Nishioka, Homin Jiang et al. March 2009 The AMiBA Hexapod Telescope Mount, The astrophysical Journal 694 (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] Fichter, E. 1986. A Stewart Platform Based Manipulator: General Theory and Practical Construction. International Journal of Robotics Research. (5): 157-181.

DOI: 10.1177/027836498600500216

Google Scholar

[7] Youssef, H. A., & El-Hofy, H. 2008. Machining Technology: machine tools and operations. CRC Press.

DOI: 10.1201/9781420043402

Google Scholar

[8] Chen, C. -T., & Liao, T. -T. 2008. Optimal Path Programming of the Stewart Platform. Advanced Robotics. 22: 705–730.

DOI: 10.1163/156855308x305281

Google Scholar

[9] Nguyen, C., & Antrazi, S. 1990. Trajectory Planning and Control of a 6 DOF Manipulator with Stewart Platform-Based Mechanism. Maryland: NASA. Process 13, 167-183.

Google Scholar

[10] Roy, Vincent. 20 October 2010 Sun_position. m. Available at: http: /www. mathworks/matlabcentral/fileexchange. com. Retrieved: [2010, October 20].

Google Scholar