Study of the Effect of MoS2 and PTFE Based Coatings on Adhesive Wear of Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

this paper, the adhesive wear characterization of MoS2, PTFE and mixture of MoS2 and PTFE films coated on stainless steel substrate, i.e. SUS440C, have been studied. The films were deposited by dry spray techniquecommercially available domestically. The films properties which are surface hardness, film thickness, surface roughness and adhesion strength were investigated. The thickness and the surface hardness of the films were approx. 7, 6.8 and 6.2 µm and 0.1,0,8 and 0.4GPa for MoS2, PTFE and the mixture of MoS2 and PTFE, respectively.The surface roughness of MoS2, PTFEwerefound to be similar with the value of Ra of approx. 0.302-0.303 µm. The mixture of MoS2 and PTFE showed smoother surface with the surface roughness (Ra) of approx.0.260µm. The PTFE film has shown better adhesion strength with higher critical load for first failure and full delamination. However, the failure pattern observed suggested lower severity of surface damage.Theresults fromtribologicaltests between the coated SUS440C ball and the SUS304 discshowedstrong effect of the coating on adhesive wear behavior of the contacting systems.For MoS2coated surface, the coatingsurface peeled offgraduallyuntil the surface ofthe substrate was revealed. Whereas, the PTFEcoated surface had delaminated immediately once in contact resulting in plate liked wear debris.The mixture ofMoS2 andPTFE haslower thefriction coefficient compared to the individual coating. Thewearbehavior found on the mixture of MoS2 and PTFE coated surface had similar characteristic to those found on surfacecoatingwithMoS2. It also showed lower wear occurrences with better appearance due to tearing wearat the edges of the worn suggesting better load capacity of the mixed film than the individual PTFE coating.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

216-222

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Claus, F. J., Solid Lubricants and Self-Lubricating Solids, Academic Press, New York, (1972).

Google Scholar

[2] I.M. Hutchings, Tribology: Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials, Edward Arnold Publishing, UK, 1992, p.73 –76.

Google Scholar

[3] Wells, A.F. (1984). Structural Inorganic Chemistry. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19- 855370-6.

Google Scholar

[4] Grattan, P. A. and Lancaster, J. K., Abrasion by lamellar solid lubricants. Wear, 10, 453, (1967).

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(67)90188-3

Google Scholar

[5] G. L. Miessler and D. A. Tarr (2004). Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd Ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall publisher. ISBN 0-13-035471-6.

Google Scholar

[6] Shriver, D. F.; Atkins, P. W.; Overton, T. L.; Rourke, J. P.; Weller, M. T.; Armstrong, F. A. (2006). Inorganic Chemistry. New York: W. H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-4878-9.

Google Scholar

[7] Available online at/http: /www. ebi. ac. uk/. Retrieved July 12, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] Available online at/http: /www2. dupont. com/Teflon_Industrial/. Retrieved 10 September (2006).

Google Scholar

[9] Fusaro, R. L., Friction and Wear Life Properties of Polyimide Thin Films, TN-D-6914, National Aero-nautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., (1972).

Google Scholar

[10] W. C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr / journal of Mater Research 7 (1992) 1564.

Google Scholar

[11] K. W. McElhaney, J. J. Vlassak and W. D. Nix / Jour of Material Research 13 (1998) 1300.

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM /: /E2546-07, /Standard Practice for Instrumented Indentation Testing.

Google Scholar

[13] Fluoropolymer Comparison – Typical Properties Retrieved 10 September (2006).

Google Scholar