Study of Two Synchronization Mechanisms for Power Electronic Building Blocks Distributed Digital Control Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

An important development trend toward power electronic technology was the integration and modularization. A key concept was Power Electronic Building Blocks (PEBB). Converters which were PEBB-based had lots of advantages, such as cost reduced, easy to reconfigure, reliability enhanced and so on. PEBB-based converters wound operation with distributed digital control, and a cascaded ring topology was the dominant solution for communication network. The characteristics of the ring topology determined the synchronization mechanism was a key technology. This paper addressed two synchronization mechanisms for ring topology network, and analyzed the factors which impact the synchronization precision. At last, aimed at the practice application, this paper compared their strongpoint with each other.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1093-1098

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Ginn, F. Ponci, and A. Monti. Multi-Agent Control of PEBB Based Power Electronic Systems[J]. PowerTech, Trondheim, Norway, Jun. 19–23, 2011: 1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2011.6019443

Google Scholar

[2] Terry Ericsen, Yuri Khersonsky, Peter K. Sterimer. PEBB concept applications in high power electronics converters[C]. IEEE PESC, Sep, 2005: 2284-2289.

DOI: 10.1109/pesc.2005.1581950

Google Scholar

[3] Antonello Monti, Ferdinanda Ponci. PEBB standardization as key enabler for power control flexibility[C]. IEEE ISIE, Bari, Italy, Jul. 4–7, 2010: 3695-3699.

DOI: 10.1109/isie.2010.5637746

Google Scholar

[4] I. Milosavljevic, Z. Ye, D. Boroyevich, and C. Holton. Analysis of converter operation with phase-leg control in daisy-chained or ring-type structure[C]. Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1999. PESC 99. 30th Annual IEEE, vol. 2, 27 June- July 1999: 1216-1221.

DOI: 10.1109/pesc.1999.785667

Google Scholar

[5] I. Celanovic, N. Celanovic, I. Milosavljevic, D. Boroyev ich, and R. Cooley. A new control architecture for future distributed power electronics systems[C]. Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2000. PESC 00.2000 IEEE 31st Annual, vol.1 , 18-23 June 2000: 113-118.

DOI: 10.1109/pesc.2000.878817

Google Scholar

[6] IEEE 1588 Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems, http ://ieeeI588.nist.gov/.

DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.7070

Google Scholar

[7] T. Laakkonen, J. Luukko, J. Ahola, P. Silventoinen. Analysis of time-stamping-based synchronization of a PEBB system[C]. IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics Conference, July 5-8, Seoul Olympic Parkel, Seoul, Korea, 2009: 12-17.

DOI: 10.1109/isie.2009.5215658

Google Scholar