Risk Evaluation of Highway Tunnel Construction Based on DEMATEL Method

Wei Guo; Qi Deng; Xiao Dong Pan

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.368-370.1472

Paper Titles

Coupling Real-Time Control of Construction Safety and Progress of Roller Compacted Concrete Dam during the Construction Period
p.1454

Design & Realization of Aided Design Function of Aided Construction and Management System for Integrated Pipe Network of Metro Station
p.1459

Influence Law of Structural Inclination for the Advanced Excavation Method of the Tunnel
p.1464

Review on the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of the Aqueduct's Supporting Structure
p.1468

Risk Evaluation of Highway Tunnel Construction Based on DEMATEL Method
p.1472

Resonance Characteristics of Stay Cables under Parametric Excitation
p.1477

The Special Construction Scheme Exploration of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project Approach Bridge in the Upper Box Girder Bridge
p.1481

Analysis on Creep Property and Model of Bridge Girder Concrete with Various Mix Proportions
p.1487

Active Earth Pressure on Retaining Wall due to Local Uniform Load
p.1497

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 368-370Risk Evaluation of Highway Tunnel Construction...

Risk Evaluation of Highway Tunnel Construction Based on DEMATEL Method

Abstract:

According to the correlation characteristics of risk factors in highway tunnel engineering construction, based on the risk identification and analysis of accidents, the interactive correlations among these risk factors are analyzed by Delphi Method. This paper adopts the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method to analyze the risk of tunnel engineering construction. Then, a comprehensive influencing coefficient of various risk factors is calculated by a comprehensive influencing matrix, the reason-result chart for these risk factors is made, and the key risk factor influencing the tunnel engineering construction is obtained. The result shows that DEMATEL method is effective for the risk analysis of tunnel engineering construction via the case study of Wulong Tunnel construction in China.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Frontiers of Green Building, Materials and Civil Engineering III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 368-370)

Pages:

1472-1476

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.368-370.1472

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Wei Guo, Qi Deng, Xiao Dong Pan

Keywords:

Construction Risk, Dematel Method, Highway Tunnel, Risk Factor

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Einstein, H, Chiaverio F, Kppel U. Risk analysis for the Adler tunnel [J]. Tunnels& Tunneling, 1994, 26(11): 28-30.

Google Scholar

[2] Review on risk assessment methods for tunneling and underground projects [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2006, 14(4): 462-469.

Google Scholar

[3] JENSEN F V. An Introduction to Bayesian Networks [M]. New York：SpringerVerlag, (1996).

Google Scholar

[4] Risk Factor Analysis of Safety and Security of Large scale Sport Events: Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Approach. Management.

DOI: 10.1109/icmss.2010.5576995

Google Scholar

[5] Kuei-Hu Chang , Ching-Hsue Cheng. Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method. J Intell Manuf (2011) 22: 113–129.

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-009-0266-x

Google Scholar

[6] Yu-Cheng Lee a, Mei-Lan Li b, Tieh-Min Yen b, Ting-Ho Huang. Analysis of adopting an integrated decision making trial and evaluation laboratory on a technology acceptance model. Expert Systems with Applications 37 (2010) 1745–1754.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.034

Google Scholar

[7] Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, Wen-Hsien Chen , Rachung Yu, Meng-Lin Shih. Fuzzy decision maps: a generalization of the DEMATEL methods. Soft Comput (2010) 14: 1141–1150.

DOI: 10.1007/s00500-009-0507-0

Google Scholar

[8] Yu-Cheng Lee, Mei-Lan Li, Tieh-Min Yen, Ting-Ho Huang. Analysis of adopting an integrated decision making trial and evaluation laboratory on a technology acceptance model. Expert Systems with Applications 37 (2010) 1745–1754.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.034

Google Scholar