Numerical Investigation of Sub-Iteration Criterions for Unsteady Flow Computations with Dual-Time Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The convergence of sub-iteration with the dual-time method is very important for the prediction of unsteady flow field. The influence of sub-iteration step number, criterion of sub-iteration convergence and the choice of physical time step size on the calculation results are discussed by solving of the two-dimensional unsteady Euler equations. A new convergence criterion (named residual criterion) of sub-iteration for unsteady flows is proposed, and the unsteady flow test case AGARD-CT5 is calculated to verify the new criterion. The results show that, with the same criterion of sub-iteration, the results from different physical time step sizes are in agreement with each other. The difference between the experiment data and the numerical results are small, and if the sub-iteration criterion used is reasonable and small enough, the dependence of numerical results of unsteady flows on the physical time step will be decreased as possible. The new criterion of sub-iteration for dual-time step unsteady calculations can be used for engineering problem.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

189-195

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jameson A. Time Dependent Calculations Using Multigrid with Applications to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoils and Wings, AIAA Paper 91-1596, June (1991).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-1596

Google Scholar

[2] Zhao Haiyang, Liu Wei and Ren Bing, The Unsteady Flow Field Calculations with a Dual-time Stepping Method, Journal of national university of defense technology, Vol. 27, No. 3, 25-29, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] Guangning Li, Fengwei Li, Zhihong Zhou and Weimin Sang, Validation of A Multigrid-Based Navier-Stokes Solver for Transonic Flows, AIAA Paper 2010-4549, June (2010).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-4549

Google Scholar

[4] Landon R H, Compendium of Unsteady Aerodynamic Measurements: NACA0012 Oscillating and Transient Pitching, AGARD-R-702, (1982).

Google Scholar

[5] Thomas P D, and Lombard C K, Geometric Conservation Law and Its Application toFlow Computations on Moving Grids, AIAA Journal, Vol. 17, 1030-1037, (1979).

DOI: 10.2514/3.61273

Google Scholar

[6] Guruswamy G P, navier-Stokes Computations on Swpt-tapered Wings, including flexibility, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 29. 588-597, (1992).

DOI: 10.2514/3.46206

Google Scholar

[7] Badcock K J, and Gaitonde A L, An Unfactored Implicit Moving Mesh Method for the Two-Dimensional Unsteady Navier-Stokes Equations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 23, No. 6, 607-631, (1996).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19960930)23:6<607::aid-fld433>3.0.co;2-e

Google Scholar

[8] Heinrich R, Pahlke K and Bleecke H, A Three-Dimensional Dual-Time-Stepping Method for the Solution of the Unsteady navier-Stokes Equations, Unsteady Aerodynamics, Royal Aeronaitical Society, London, 1996, p.5. 1-5. 12.

Google Scholar

[9] Gaitonde A and Fiddes S P, A Moving Mesh System for the Calculation of Unsteady Flows, AIAA Paper 93-0641, Jan. (1993).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1993-641

Google Scholar