Design and Analysis of the Bio-Inspired Rear Under-Run Protection Devices for Heavy Truck

Abstract:

The rear under-run protection devices (RUPD) could prevent the entry of a small vehicle under rear side of the heavy truck, and decrease the injuries and deaths when the accident occurs. In this paper, a new concept of the mechanical design of heavy truck RUPD is presented based on the bio-inspired method, by analyzing the structure of a kind of sheep horn, which has good capacities of energy absorption and structural strength. Firstly, the space geometry characteristic of the sheep horn in macroscopic view was analyzed. Then the research was focused on its mechanical property, and the microstructure of the horn sample was observed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Based on the test results, the structure characteristic and force condition of the horn were discussed. A new RUPD structure was designed in both macro and micro levels using bionic principle. The superior mechanics performance of the sheep horn was transplanted into the new RUPD. Finally, the finite element model for the new RUPD, which is inspired from the sheep horn, was established and analyzed. Simulation results showed that the protection device had better strength characteristic and could effectively protect car occupants in under-run accidents. Therefore, with the remarkable strength performance and simple structure, the bionic RUPD shows the promise for practical application.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 461)
• Pages: 499-505
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.461.499
• Online since: November 2013
• Authors: Bo Hua Sun, Jian Zhao, Zi Yang, Lu Quan Ren, Bing Zhu
• Keywords: Bio-Inspired Design, Finite Element, Heavy Truck, Multiscale Modeling, Rear Under-Run Protection Devices, Sheep Horn

References

[1] Vicente Milanes, Joshue Perez, Jorge Godoy, Enrique Onieva. A fuzzy aid rear-end collision warning/avoidance system. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39 (2012): 9097-9107.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.054

[2] http: /www. c-ncap. org/C-NCAP/gjdt/elyy/webinfo/2011/05/1304750102503701. htm.

[3] Atahan, A.O., Abehshik, J. and El-Gindy, M. A rear-end protection device for heavy vehicles. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 5th Symposium on Advances in Vehicle Technologies, Washington DC, 2003, pp.1-9.

DOI: 10.1115/imece2003-42455

[4] Ali Osman Atahan. A recommended specification for heavy vehicle rear underrun guards. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 (2007): 696–707.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.016

[5] Bryan C. Baker, Joseph M. Nolan, Brian O'Neill, Alexander P. Genetos. Crash compatibility between cars and light trucks: Benefits of lowering front-end energy-absorbing structure in SUVs and pickups. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.008

[6] Marc Fredette, Lema Sikoti Mambu, Aline Chouinard, Francois Bellavance. Safety impacts due to the incompatibility of SUVs, minivans, and pickup trucks in two-vehicle collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40 (2008): 1987–(1995).

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.026

[7] Manuel Castellanos, M. El-Gindy, Chris Fedishen, Daniel Maciejewski, Ali O. Atahan. Development of heavy truck front underride protection device. Int. J. Heavy Vehicle Systems, 2012, Vol. 19(1): 60-75.

DOI: 10.1504/ijhvs.2012.045760

[8] Mariolani, J.R.L., Arruda, A.C.F. and Schmutzler, L.O.F. Development of new underride guards for enhancement of compatibility between trucks and cars. Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper No. 425, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (2001).

[9] Shubin WEI, Muxi LEI, Zhengbao LEI, Yonghan LI. Parameters optimization for the thread of crankslider-CST type low rear protective device of truck. IEEE. 2011. 978-1-61284-459-6/11.

DOI: 10.1109/cecnet.2011.5768948

[10] Li Zheng-guan, GUO Ce. Research on Energy Absorbing Structure of Bio-inspired Beetle Cuticles and Its Design. Machine Building Automation, 2012, 41( 6) : 115～117, 120.

[11] Kun Cai, Jiao Shi. A Bionic Approach for Topology Optimization for Tension-only or Compression-only Design. Journal of Bionic Engineering 7 (2010): 397–404.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(10)60272-7

[12] Yan Liang, Jie Zhao, Chengwei Wu. The Micro/Nanostructure Characteristics and the Mechanical Properties of Hemifusus tuba Conch Shell. Journal of Bionic Engineering 7 (2010): 307–313.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(10)60261-2

[13] T. Salumäe, M. Kruusmaa. A Flexible Fin with Bio-Inspired Stiffness Profile and Geometry. Journal of Bionic Engineering 8 (2011): 418–428.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(11)60047-4

[14] Parimal Maity, Srinivasan Arjun Tekalur. Finite Element Analysis of Ramming in Ovis canadensis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. FEBRUARY 2011, Vol. 133/021009-1.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4003321

[15] J. McKittrick, P. -Y. Chen, L. Tombolato, E.E. Novitskaya, M.W. Trim, G.A. Hirata, E.A. Olevsky, M.F. Horstemeyer, M.A. Meyers. Energy absorbent natural materials and bioinspired design strategies: A review. Materials Science and Engineering C 30 (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.01.011