The Simplified Flow Field Analysis Method of Multi-Layers Parallel Plates Perfusion Bioreactor

Article Preview

Abstract:

Multi-layers parallel plates perfusion bioreactor has the potential advantage in cells cultivation of tissue engineering and good scalability for cells cultivation on a large scale. It is necessary to analyze the distribution of flow shear stress (FSS) of bioreactors which has strong influence on the growth of cells. The result of meshing was not satisfactory because of the complexity of multi-layers parallel plates when using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to analyze the FSS, and the amount of calculation was great and complex especially under the process of influence on FSS caused by analyzing the different structure. The new method of simplified flow field analysis was presented in this paper, which was based on relation between FSS and flow and made the process simpler by analyzing distribution of rate instead of FSS. The simulation result showed that this method can satisfy the requirement of precision and provide reference for the analysis of the flow field which had the established relationship between structural parameters and laminar flow within it.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

191-196

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Tianliang Wang, in: Stem cell tissue engineering. Basic theory and clinical application. Science Publisher , Beijing 2011, pp.55-65.

Google Scholar

[2] ParkJ, Li Y, Berthiaume F. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 99(2008), pp.455-67.

Google Scholar

[3] De Bartolo L, Jarosch-Von Schweder G, Haverich A. Biotechnol. Prog. 16(2000), pp.102-108.

DOI: 10.1021/bp990128o

Google Scholar

[4] Lei Xia, Talha Arooz, Shufang Zhang, Xiaoye Tuo. Biomaterials. 33(2012), pp.7925-7932.

Google Scholar

[5] Dunn JC, Tompkins R G, Yarmush ML. Biotechnol. Prog. 7(1991), pp.237-245.

Google Scholar

[6] Ferrini J B, Pichard L, Domergue J, Maurel P. Interact. 107(1997), pp.31-45.

Google Scholar

[7] Wilson, J. WR. Ramamurthy S. Porwollik, M. Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci. USA. 99(2002), pp.13807-13812.

Google Scholar

[8] Xiaojiang Sun, Kerong Dai, Tingting Tang, Youzhuan Xie, Xingxian Jiang, Jianxi Lu. J. Med. Biomechanics, 24(2009), pp.21-27.

Google Scholar

[9] A.J.F. Stops, K.B. Heraty, M. Browne, F.J. O'Brien, P.E. McHugh. Journal of Biomechanics. 43 (2010), p.618–626.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Araida, Hidalgo-Bastida, SundaramoorthyThirunavukkarasu, SarahGriffiths, Sarah H. Cartmell, Shailesh Naire. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 109(2012), p.1095–1099.

Google Scholar

[11] Benjamin J. Lawrence, Mamatha Devarapalli, Sundararajan V. Madihally. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 102(2009), p.935–947.

Google Scholar

[12] Brown A, Meenan B J. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc(2007), p.5387–5390.

Google Scholar

[13] CioffiM, Boschetti F, Raimondi MT, Dubini G. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 93(2006), p.500–510.

Google Scholar

[14] Porter B, Zauel R, Stockman H, Guldberg R, Fyhrie D. Journal of Biomechanics. 38 (2005), p.543–549.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.04.011

Google Scholar

[15] Sander EA, Nauman EA. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 31(2003), p.1–26.

Google Scholar

[16] Williams KA, Saini S, Wick TM. Biotechnol. Prog. 18(2002), p.951–963.

Google Scholar

[17] Bilgen B, Barabino GA. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 98(2007), p.282–294.

Google Scholar

[18] Stephens JS, Cooper JA, Phelan FR, Jr., Dunkers JP. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 97(2007), p.952–961.

Google Scholar

[19] Gang Xu, Kairong Qin, Zhaorong Liu. Chinese quarterly of mechanics. 21(2000), pp.45-51.

Google Scholar