Actuator Power Consumption of Active Suspension System with Override Control Strategy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main function of the vehicle suspension is to improve ride and handling performance. In vehicle active suspension, better ride comfort is usually required larger control input and larger suspension deflection. However, the actuator that deliver the control signal have a limitation which is commonly known as actuator saturation. There is also a structural constraint that limits the suspension deflection. In this study, an alternative approach to the vehicle active suspension system is proposed. In this approach, some separation in the controller such that one part is devoted to achieve nominal performance and the other part is devoted to constraint handling is performed. In addition, the actuator power consumption of the proposed control strategy is further investigated numerically. The simulation results show that the proposed control strategy can manage the trade-off between performance and the actuator power consumption.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

438-443

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Chen and K. -H. Guo, Constrained H∞ control of active suspensions: An LMI approach, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 13, no. 3, p.412–421, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2004.841661

Google Scholar

[2] W. Sun, H. Gao, and O. Kaynak, Finite frequency H∞ control for vehicle active suspension systems, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 19, no. 2, p.416–422, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2010.2042296

Google Scholar

[3] M. C. Turner and I. Postlethwaite, Output violation compensation for systems with output constraints, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 47, no. 9, p.1540–1546, (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/tac.2002.802752

Google Scholar

[4] M. C. Turner and I. Postlethwaite, Multivariable override control for system with output and state constraints, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 14, p.1105–1131, (2004).

DOI: 10.1002/rnc.936

Google Scholar

[5] Y. K. Park and H. Y. Young, Dynamic anti-windup based control method for state constrained systems, Automatica, vol. 39, p.1951–1922, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(03)00217-6

Google Scholar

[6] U. Wasiwitono and M. Saeki, Fixed-order output feedback control with anti-windup compensation or active suspension systems, Journal of System Design and Dynamics, vol. 2, no. 2, p.264–278, (2011).

DOI: 10.1299/jsdd.5.264

Google Scholar

[7] S. Tarbouriech and M. Turner, Anti-windup design: an overview of some recent advances and open problems, Control Theory & Applications, vol. 1, p.1–19, (2009).

DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta:20070435

Google Scholar

[8] H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems. Prentice-Hall, Inc, second ed., (1996).

Google Scholar