Computational Simulation of Mechanical Microenvironment of Early Stage of Bone Healing under Locking Compression Plate with Dynamic Locking Screws

Abstract:

It is well known that bone healing outcomes highly depend on the mechanical microenvironment of the fracture site, and a certain degree of interfragmentary movement (IFM) is essential for indirect (i.e. natural) bone healing. The application of locking compression plate (LCP) internal fixation in the treatment of bone fracture is a common practice which leads to early mobility and full function of the fractured extremity. However should the fixation configuration be too stiff, it might result in delayed healing or asymmetric tissue development across the fracture site due to the fact that IFM in near cortex area is too small to promote healing. Dynamic locking screw (DLS) has been recently designed to tackle this problem by reducing the stiffness of LCP fixation. However, the actual mechano-regulation mechanisms in which DLS uses to regulate the healing process are still not fully understood. The objective of this paper is to develop a computational model to understand the change of mechanical microenvironment of fracture site under LCP with dynamic locking screw in comparison to standard locking screw, and how this change could potentially regulate tissue development within the fracture callus during the healing process.Keywords: bone healing, locking compression plate, dynamic locking screw, finite element modelling

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 553)
• Pages: 281-286
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.553.281
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Saeed Miramini*, Li Hai Zhang, Martin Richardson, Priyan Mendis
• Keywords: Bone Healing, Dynamic Locking Screw, Finite Element Modeling (FEM), Locking Compression Plate

References

[1] M. Bottlang, J. Doornink, T. J. Lujan, D. C. Fitzpatrick, J. L. Marsh, P. Augat, et al., Effects of construct stiffness on healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates., The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, vol. 92 Suppl 2, pp.12-22, (2010).

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.j.00780

[2] L. Claes, Biomechanical principles and mechanobiologic aspects of flexible and locked plating., Journal of orthopaedic trauma, vol. 25 Suppl 1, pp. S4-7, (2011).

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e318207093e

[3] L. Claes, M. Reusch, M. Göckelmann, M. Ohnmacht, T. Wehner, M. Amling, et al., Metaphyseal fracture healing follows similar biomechanical rules as diaphyseal healing, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 29, pp.425-432, (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/jor.21227

[4] T. J. Lujan, C. E. Henderson, S. M. Madey, D. C. Fitzpatrick, J. L. Marsh, and M. Bottlang, Locked plating of distal femur fractures leads to inconsistent and asymmetric callus formation., Journal of orthopaedic trauma, vol. 24, pp.156-62, (2010).

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3181be6720

[5] H. -C. Pape and M. Bottlang, Flexible fixation with locking plates., Journal of orthopaedic trauma, vol. 25 Suppl 1, pp. S1-3, (2011).

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3182079ef4

[6] S. M. Perren, Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology., The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, pp.1093-1110, (2002).

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.0841093

[7] C. E. Henderson, M. Bottlang, J. L. Marsh, D. C. Fitzpatrick, and S. M. Madey, Does locked plating of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures promote bone healing by callus formation? Two cases with opposite outcomes., The Iowa orthopaedic journal, vol. 28, pp.73-6, (2008).

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3181be6720

[8] M. Bottlang, M. Lesser, J. Koerber, J. Doornink, B. von Rechenberg, P. Augat, et al., Far cortical locking can improve healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates., The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, vol. 92, pp.1652-60, (2010).

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.i.01111

[9] R. Zdero and H. Bougherara, x Orthopaedic Biomechanics : A Practical Approach to Combining Mechanical Testing and Finite Element Analysis, pp.171-194, (2010).

DOI: 10.5772/10077

[10] S. -H. Kim, S. -H. Chang, and H. -J. Jung, The finite element analysis of a fractured tibia applied by composite bone plates considering contact conditions and time-varying properties of curing tissues, Composite Structures, vol. 92, pp.2109-2118, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.051

[11] K. JH and C. SH, Design of a flexible composite bone plate for bone fracture healing, in 14th international conference on composite structures, ed. Melbourne, Australia, (2007).

[12] A. Rabiei, Recent developments and the future of bone mimicking: materials for use in biomedical implants., Expert review of medical devices, vol. 7, pp.727-9, (2010).

DOI: 10.1586/erd.10.51

[13] A. Rabiei, Composite metal foam and methods of preparation thereof, (2012).

[14] D. L. Miller and T. Goswami, A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healing., Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), vol. 22, pp.1049-62, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.004

[15] D. J. Hak, S. Toker, C. Yi, and J. Toreson, The influence of fracture fixation biomechanics on fracture healing., Orthopedics, vol. 33, pp.752-5, (2010).

DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100826-20

[16] M. Ahmad, R. Nanda, a. S. Bajwa, J. Candal-Couto, S. Green, and a. C. Hui, Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?, Injury, vol. 38, pp.358-64, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.058

[17] K. Stoffel, U. Dieter, G. Stachowiak, A. Gächter, and M. S. Kuster, Biomechanical testing of the LCP – how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?, Injury, vol. 34, pp.11-19, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.021

[18] R. M. Sellei, R. L. Garrison, P. Kobbe, P. Lichte, M. Knobe, and H. -C. Pape, Effects of near cortical slotted holes in locking plate constructs., Journal of orthopaedic trauma, vol. 25 Suppl 1, pp. S35-40, (2011).

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3182070f2d

[19] M. J. Gardner, S. E. Nork, P. Huber, and J. C. Krieg, Less rigid stable fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone using locked plates with near cortical slots., Injury, vol. 41, pp.652-6, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.022

[20] M. J. Gardner, S. E. Nork, P. Huber, and J. C. Krieg, Stiffness modulation of locking plate constructs using near cortical slotted holes: a preliminary study., Journal of orthopaedic trauma, vol. 23, pp.281-7, (2009).

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e31819df775

[21] S. Döbele, C. Horn, S. Eichhorn, A. Buchholtz, A. Lenich, R. Burgkart, et al., The dynamic locking screw (DLS) can increase interfragmentary motion on the near cortex of locked plating constructs by reducing the axial stiffness., " Langenbeck, s archives of surgery / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, vol. 395, pp.421-8, (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s00423-010-0636-z

[22] M. Plecko, N. Lagerpusch, D. Andermatt, R. Frigg, R. Koch, M. Sidler, et al., The dynamisation of locking plate osteosynthesis by means of dynamic locking screws (DLS)-An experimental study in sheep., Injury, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.022

[23] M. Bottlang and F. Feist, Biomechanics of far cortical locking., Journal of orthopaedic trauma, vol. 25 Suppl 1, pp. S21-8, (2011).

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e318207885b

[24] J. Doornink, D. C. Fitzpatrick, S. M. Madey, and M. Bottlang, Far cortical locking enables flexible fixation with periarticular locking plates., Journal of orthopaedic trauma, vol. 25 Suppl 1, pp. S29-34, (2011).

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3182070cda

[25] M. Bottlang, J. Doornink, D. C. Fitzpatrick, and S. M. Madey, Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength., The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, vol. 91, pp.1985-94, (2009).

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.h.01038

[26] Z. Thompson, T. Miclau, D. Hu, and J. a. Helms, A model for intramembranous ossification during fracture healing., Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, vol. 20, pp.1091-8, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00017-7

[27] P. Klein, The initial phase of fracture healing is specifically sensitive to mechanical conditions, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 21, p.662, (2003).

[28] D. R. Epari, W. R. Taylor, M. O. Heller, and G. N. Duda, Mechanical conditions in the initial phase of bone healing., Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), vol. 21, pp.646-55, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.01.003

[29] M. A. Soltz and G. A. Ateshian, A Conewise Linear Elasticity Nonlinearity in Articular Cartilage, Bioengineering, vol. 122, (2000).

DOI: 10.1115/1.1324669

[30] L. Zhang, B. S. Gardiner, D. W. Smith, P. Pivonka, and A. J. Grodzinsky, Integrated model of IGF-I mediated biosynthesis in deforming articular cartilage, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 135, pp.439-449, (2009).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2009)135:5(439)

[31] L. Zhang, B. S. Gardiner, D. W. Smith, P. Pivonka, and A. J. Grodzinsky, A fully coupled poroelastic reactive-transport model of cartilage, Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, vol. 5, pp.133-153, (2008).

[32] L. Zhang, B. S. Gardiner, D. W. Smith, P. Pivonka, and A. J. Grodzinsky, IGF uptake with competitive binding in articular cartilage, Journal of Biological Systems, vol. 16, pp.175-195, (2008).

DOI: 10.1142/s0218339008002575

[33] COMSOL Multiphysics, 4. 3 ed: COMSOL Inc, (2012).

[34] W. Mccartney, B. Donald, and M. Hashmi, Comparative performance of a flexible fixation implant to a rigid implant in static and repetitive incremental loading, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 169, pp.476-484, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.104

[35] D. Lacroix and P. J. Prendergast, A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading., in Journal of biomechanics vol. 35, ed, 2002, pp.1163-71.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00086-6

[36] S. M. Perren, Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation., Clinical orthopaedics and related research, pp.175-96, (1979).

[37] P. J. Prendergast, R. Huiskes, and K. Soballe, Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces, vol. 30, (1997).

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00140-6

[38] L. E. Claes, C. a. Heigele, C. Neidlinger-Wilke, D. Kaspar, W. Seidl, K. J. Margevicius, et al., Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process., Clinical orthopaedics and related research, pp. S132-47, (1998).

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00015

[39] D. R. Carter, G. S. Beaupré, N. J. Giori, and J. a. Helms, Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration., Clinical orthopaedics and related research, pp. S41-55, (1998).

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00006

[40] R. Huiskes, W. D. Van Driel, P. J. Prendergast, and K. Søballe, A biomechanical regulatory model for periprosthetic fibrous-tissue differentiation., Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, vol. 8, pp.785-8, (1997).

DOI: 10.1023/a:1018520914512