Numerical Simulation of Particle Trajectory in Electrostatic Precipitator

Article Preview

Abstract:

The performance of Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) is significantly affected by complex flow distribution. Recent years, many numerical models have been developed to model the particle motion in the electrostatic precipitators. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code FLUENT is used in description of the turbulent gas flow and the particle motion under electrostatic forces. The gas flow are carried out by solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and turbulence is modeled by the k-ε turbulence model. The effect of electric field is described by a series equations, such as the electric field and charge transport equations, the charged particle equation, the charge conservation equation, the mass and momentum equations of gas, the mass and momentum equations of particle and so on. The particle phase is simulated by using Discrete Phase Model (DPM). The simulations showed that the particle trajectory inside the ESP is influenced by both the aerodynamic and electrostatic forces. The simulated results have been validated by the established data.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1743-1748

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N. Farnoosh, k. Adamiak, G.S.P. Castle, Three-dimensional analysis of electrohydrodynamic flow in a spiked electrode-plate electrostatic precipitator, Journal of Electrostatics. Vol. 69, pp.419-428. (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2011.06.002

Google Scholar

[2] A. Mizuno, Electrostatic precipitation, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp.615-624. (2000).

DOI: 10.1109/94.879357

Google Scholar

[3] Hak-Joon Kim, Bangwoo Han, Yong-Jin Kim, Seok-Jun Yoa & Tetsuji Oda: Integration of a nonmetallic electrostatic precipitator and a wet scrubber for improved removal of particles and corrosive gas cleaning in semiconductor manufacturing industries, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 62, No. 8, pp.905-915. (2012).

DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2012.686893

Google Scholar

[4] Grigoriu et al., Aerosol and Air Quality Research, Vol. 12, p.673–682. (2012).

Google Scholar

[5] K.R. Parker, et al., Applied Electrostatic Precipitation (Blackie Academic & Professional, London 1997).

Google Scholar

[6] Wang, L.K., N.C. Pereira, and Y.T. Hung. Air Pollution Control Engineering(Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 2004).

Google Scholar

[7] Senior, C.L., Helble, j. j. and Sarofim, A.F. Emissions of Mercury, Trace Elements, and Fine Particles from Stationary Combustion Source. Fuel Process. Technol. 65: 263-288. (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(00)00082-5

Google Scholar

[8] Zhuang, Y., Kim, Y. J., Lee, T.G. and Biswas,P. Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Ultra-fine Particle Behavior in Electrostatic Precipitators. J. Electrostat. 48: 245-260. (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3886(99)00072-8

Google Scholar

[9] C. J. Chen, Shenq- Yuh Jaw, Fundamentals of turbulence modeling, Taylor & Francis(1998).

Google Scholar