Research on the Dynamic Compensation Mechanism that is Brought by Engineering Measurement to the Contract Status

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on engineering measurement ,the contract state change is classified into three types: variation, deviation on bill of quantities, discrepancy in BQ quantity. Based on this, analysis is made on the dynamic compensation mechanism that the bill of quantities can have to the contract state according to the change type of the contract state of the bill of quantities, finally the quantitative value adjusted by the contract price based on the change type of the three contract state based on the bill of quantities.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2647-2652

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Cheng Hu. Study of Engineering Contract Status [J]. Architecture Economy, 1995(2): 39-41. 1995(2): 39-41.

Google Scholar

[2] Yang Liming, Luo Ting. Construction Claim Model Relating to Engineering Contract Status [J]. Construction Management Modernization, 2006 (1) : 41-43.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang Xiaoli. Research on Implementation Method of the Construction Contract Price Adjustment from Risk Sharing Perspective[D]. Tianjin University of Technology, (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] Wang Heping. Engineering Problems Under Project Amount List Price Model [J]. Architecture Economy, 2006 (6): 76-79. 1995(2): 39-41.

Google Scholar

[5] He Zhengwen, Xu Yu. Project Payment Progress Optimization: a Case [J]. Journal of management in Engineering, 2008, 22(1): 67-71.

Google Scholar

[6] Ya Lin. Adjust the Amount of Listing Physical Works from the Perspective of Contract Management [J]. Architecture Economy, 2006(6): 76-79. 1995(2): 39-41.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang Xiaoping. Conflicts and Solutions between Code of Valuation with Bill and Lump-sum Contract (Version 08) [J]. Architecture Economy, 2011(8): 62-64. 1995(2): 39-41.

Google Scholar

[8] Gan Youwen, Li Yuntao. The Analysis of Cause of Subsidence Engineering Change in Reclamation Projects and Relevant Solution. 2011, 42(11): 92-94.

Google Scholar

[9] Gao Haichao. Research on Revenue Management Contractor under Engineering Change Conditions [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Technology, (2012).

Google Scholar

[10] Ma Guihong. Application of Entity Engineering Quantity Adjustment in the Bill of Quantities [J]. Journal of Lvliang College, 2009, 251): 53-55.

Google Scholar

[11] Yan Ling, Zhao Chaochao. Study on the Adjustment of Measure Expense Based on Engineering Quantity Change [J]. Building Economy, 2004 (9): 83-86.

Google Scholar

[12] Ji Guoliang. Effects of Engineering Change to Cost of Construction in Project Design Changes [J]. Chinese Municipal Engineering, 2008 (12): 57-59.

Google Scholar

[13] Zhang Yu. Owners Risk Prevention in the Tender of Bill of Quantities [J]. Architecture Economy, 2004(9): 83-86. 1995(2): 39-41.

Google Scholar

[14] Jia Mengyun. Project Cost Management in the Engineering Change Management [J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2010, 32 (4): 145.

Google Scholar

[15] Tang XiaoQian. Risk Management Analysis of Owner Contract Price in Power Engineering [J]. Shanghai Electric Power, 2011(10): 410-412.

Google Scholar

[16] Zhang Xiuhong. Effective Control of the Construction Project Cost [J]. Architecture Economy, 2004(11): 89-91. 1995(2): 39-41.

Google Scholar

[17] Zeng Xiangrui, Gao Ping. Analysis of the Improvement of Engineering Change Pricing Terms [J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2011, 25 (3): 276-279.

Google Scholar

[18] You Shixiang, Zhao Xiaohua. Risk Analysis of Contractor in the Bill of Quantities Mode [J]. Chemical Engineering and Equipment, 2009(11): 202-205.

Google Scholar

[19] Sun Yuhong. Risk Analysis of Engineering Change in the Bill of Quantities Mode [J]. Architecture Economy, 2006(7): 219-221.

Google Scholar

[20] Lv Min, Pan Hui. BOQ Valuation Principles of Contract Settlement Price Adjustment [J]. Architecture Economy, 2007(7): 244-246.

Google Scholar

[21] Yan Ling, Yin Yilin. Project Valuation Practice [M]. Beijing: Science Press, (2010).

Google Scholar

[22] Li Weifang. Confirmation and Control of Engineering Alteration [J]. Architecture Economy, 2007(3): 21-23.

Google Scholar

[23] Xiang Yue. Analysis of the Leakage Problem in the Process of Engineering Quantity List [J]. Sichuan Building Materials, 2009(5): 223-225.

Google Scholar

[24] Wang Jing, Yang Wensong. Prevention and Dealing of List Missing Problem under Fixed-price Contract [J]. Architecture Economy, 2007(7): 235-237.

Google Scholar

[25] Pan Mansheng. Problems and Countermeasures of Water Gap Project Cost Management [J]. Science and Technology Innovation Herald. 2012(12): 147-150.

Google Scholar

[26] Pan Zhiyong. Problems and Countermeasures of Lack of Preparation of Bill Quantity of Construction Engineering Project [J]. Jiangxi Building Materials. 2012(1): 257-259.

Google Scholar

[27] Chen Guangzhong. Discussion on Some Problems of Theory and Practice of Reform of Criminal Evidence System - from the Perspective of Two Rules of Evidence, [J]. Chinese Law. 2010(6): 5-16.

Google Scholar