Evaluating Information Course in Elementary Education by Fuzzy TOPSIS

Article Preview

Abstract:

Education in elementary school belongs to holistic education for students. In the education courses, information course being a technology is applied in the rest courses to explore related knowledge automatically for students because they can capture these concerning knowledge of the rest courses through information technology such as Internet or search engine. On the other hand, Internet is full of numerous immoral contents and websites, and immoral things easily mislead students that perform incorrect behaviors. Thus evaluating information course in elementary education will be important and essential. In this paper, we evaluate information course with several feasible alternatives in elementary education by fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (FMCDM) called fuzzy TOPSIS. By fuzzy TOPSIS, an optimal teaching alternative of information course is selected form feasible alternatives.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2757-2761

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Dalacosta, M. Kamariotaki-Paparrigopoulou, J.A. Palyvos, N. Spyrellis: Multimedia Application with Animated Cartoons for Teaching Science in Elementary Education. Computers and Education. 52, 741-748 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.018

Google Scholar

[2] D. Masats, M. Dooly: Rethinking the Use of Video in Teacher Education: A Holistic Approach. Teaching and Teacher Education. 27, 1151-1162 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.004

Google Scholar

[3] R.G. Lauterbach: Computers in the Child's Home: Introducing Tomorrow's Crisis of Elementary Education?. Education and Computing. 2, 39-46 (1986).

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9287(86)90866-6

Google Scholar

[4] L.R.B. Muller, M.J. Elias, M.A. Gara, K. Schneider: The Development and Interrelationship of Affective, Cognitive, and Social-cognitive Skills in Children: Theoretical Implications. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 13, 271-291 (1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0193-3973(92)90033-e

Google Scholar

[5] B.S. Bloom,: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Cognitive Domain. New York, Longman (1956).

Google Scholar

[6] B.S. Bloom,: Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York, McGraw-Hill (1976).

Google Scholar

[7] B.S. Bloom: Developing Talent in Young People. New York, Ballentine (1985).

Google Scholar

[8] M. Delgado, J.L. Verdegay, M.A. Vila: Linguistic Decision-Making Models. International Journal of Intelligent System. 7, 479-492 (1992).

DOI: 10.1002/int.4550070507

Google Scholar

[9] F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J.L. Verdegay: A Model of Consensus in Group Decision Making under Linguistic Assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 78, 73-87 (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00107-7

Google Scholar

[10] L.A. Zadeh,: Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control. 8, 338-353(1965).

Google Scholar

[11] H.J. Zimmermann: Fuzzy Set: Decision Making and Expert System. Kluwer, Boston (1987).

Google Scholar

[12] H.J. Zimmermann: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Application. Kluwer, Boston (1991).

Google Scholar

[13] C.T. Chen: Extensions to the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 114, 1-9 (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00377-1

Google Scholar

[14] H.M. Hsu, C.T. Chen: Fuzzy Credibility Relation Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Problems. Information Sciences. 96, 79-91 (1997).

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-0255(96)00153-3

Google Scholar

[15] H.S. Lee: A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for the Selection of the Distribution Center. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. 3612, 1290-1299 (2005).

DOI: 10.1007/11539902_164

Google Scholar

[16] H.S. Lee: On Fuzzy Preference Relation in Group Decision Making. International Journal of Computer Mathematics. 82, 133-140 (2005).

DOI: 10.1080/0020716042000272548

Google Scholar

[17] G.S. Liang: Fuzzy MCDM Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Concepts. European Journal of Operational Research. 112, 682-691 (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00410-4

Google Scholar

[18] Y.J. Wang, H.S. Lee: Generalizing the TOPSIS for Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Group Decision-Making. Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 53, 1762-1772 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.08.037

Google Scholar

[19] Y.J. Wang, H.S. Lee, K. Lin: Fuzzy TOPSIS for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. International Mathematical Journal. 3, 367-379 (2003).

Google Scholar

[20] C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Application. Springer, New York (1981).

Google Scholar