SWOT Analysis of Chinese Rural Information Society Policies

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) for Chinese rural information society development (CRISD) policies in terms of its missions and strategies. After briefly describing the institutional and information society development contexts, the paper draws on literature reviews and questionnaires survey to list of SWOT factors for CRISD. These findings could be used to help adjust the next step work to support decision making for rural information society construction and to provide a valuable reference for other investors who are planning to invest in information society programs in China’s rural regions. This article presents valuable missions and strategic goals through the SWOT analysis for realizing information society development in Chinese rural areas.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1065-1068

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Peter Williams. Using information and communication technology with special educational needs student, Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 2005, 57( 6): 539-553.

DOI: 10.1108/00012530510634262

Google Scholar

[2] Chun Liu: submitted to Journal of Government Information Quarterly ( 2012).

Google Scholar

[3] David Bromwich and Max Saunders: submitted to Journal of Development in Practice ( 2012).

Google Scholar

[4] OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2001. The DAC Guidelines-Poverty Reduction . Paris(PDF Version of Document Downloaded May 2011).

Google Scholar

[5] CPC(Central Committee & State Council), Suggestions on various policy issues on the promotion of the farmer's income. Beijing. (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] Jun Xia. : submitted to Journal of Government Information Quarterly (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] IOS Press: submitted to Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation ( 2009).

Google Scholar

[8] Rhoda C. Joseph: submitted to Journal of Government Information Quarterly (2013).

Google Scholar

[9] Ewa Ziemba and Celina M. Olszak: submitted to Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology( 2012).

Google Scholar