Numerical-Experimental Comparison to Validate a Mathematical Model for the Determination of the Superplastic Material Constants

Giuliano Gillo

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.607.25

Paper Titles

Oxidation of Inconel 690 Alloys at 800-1000°C in Air
p.7

Effects of TiC/TiN Contents and Sintering Temperatures on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al₂O₃/Ti(C,N) Ceramic Materials
p.12

Residual Life Prediction for In-Service Pressure Vessels Containing Crack Defects
p.17

Gases Effects for Synthesis ZnO Nanostructures Using Carbon Assisted
p.21

Numerical-Experimental Comparison to Validate a Mathematical Model for the Determination of the Superplastic Material Constants
p.25

Mathematical Modelling to Evaluate the Superplastic Material Constants by Bulge Test
p.29

Corrosion Behavior of Electrodeposited CoNiFe Nanoparticles Immersed in Different Environments
p.33

Clustering of Composite Protein Films and their Packaging Properties
p.37

Study on Performance of 8YSZ Thick Gradient TBC
p.43

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 607Numerical-Experimental Comparison to Validate a...

Numerical-Experimental Comparison to Validate a Mathematical Model for the Determination of the Superplastic Material Constants

Abstract:

This paper shows a numerical-experimental comparison to validate a mathematical model which is able to determine the superplastic material constants by means of experimental tests carried out using a standard forming die geometry. In particular, the constants m, n and K for the lead-tin alloy PbSn60, for the alloy AZ31 at different forming temperatures and for the alloy AA5083 are evaluated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Machine Design and Manufacturing Engineering III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 607)

Pages:

25-28

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.607.25

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Giuliano Gillo*

Keywords:

Bulge Test, Finite Element Method (FEM), Material Constants, Mathematical Modeling

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Ridley N, Metals for superplastic forming. In: Giuliano G (ed. ) Superplastic forming of advanced metallic materials, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2011, pp.3-33.

DOI: 10.1533/9780857092779.1.3

Google Scholar

[2] Chandra N. Constitutive behaviour of superplastic materials. Int J Non Linear Mech; 37 (2002) 461-484.

Google Scholar

[3] Giuliano G. Mathematical modelling to evaluate the superplastic material constants by bulge test. Submitted to ICMDME2014 (2014).

Google Scholar

[4] MSC. Marc, Element library, B (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] Giuliano G, Franchitti S. On the evaluation of superplastic characteristics using the finite element method. Int J Mach Tool Manu; 47 (2007) 471-476.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.009

Google Scholar

[6] Giuliano G. AZ31 magnesium alloy parameters identification through inverse analysis at 713 K, Key Eng Mat; 504–506 (2012) 643-646.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.504-506.643

Google Scholar

[7] Giuliano G. On the constants of the superplastic magnesium-based AZ31 alloy. 1st International Conference on Material Modelling, Dortmund, Germany, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] Giuliano G. Constitutive modelling of superplastic AA-5083. 2st International Conference on Material Modelling, Paris, France, (2011).

Google Scholar