Predicting Nanofiltration Performance during Treatment of Welding Electrode Manufacturing Wastewater, Using Artificial Neural Networks

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents artificial neural network (ANN) predictions for a nanofiltration membrane used to treat wastewater of welding electrode manufacturing in a cross flow set up. The main parameters were time, feed flow rate, and transmembrane pressure (TMP). The experimental data were correlated and analyzed using ANN. ANN’s prediction of the permeate flux, turbidity, total dissolved solids (TDS), hardness for various TMPs, and flow rates are discussed. The effects of the training algorithm, neural network architectures, and transfer function on the ANN performance, as reflected by the percentage average absolute deviation, are discussed. A network with one input layer, 50-100 hidden layers, and one output layer is found to be adequate for mapping input–output relationships and providing a good interpolative tool. A good agreement has been obtained between the ANN predictions and the experimental data with a deviation below 2% for all cases considered.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

55-59

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lau, W. -J. and A.F. Ismail, Polymeric nanofiltration membranes for textile dye wastewater treatment: Preparation, performance evaluation, transport modelling, and fouling control - a review. Desalination, 2009. 245(1-3): pp.321-348.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.12.058

Google Scholar

[2] Capar, G., U. Yetis, and L. Yilmaz, The most effective pre-treatment to nanofiltration for the recovery of print dyeing wastewaters. Desalination, 2007. 212(1-3): pp.103-113.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.09.020

Google Scholar

[3] Ahmad, A.L., S. Ismail, and S. Bhatia, Membrane treatment for palm oil mill effluent: Effect of transmembrane pressure and crossflow velocity. Desalination, 2005. 179(1-3): pp.245-255.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.071

Google Scholar

[4] Ahmad, A.L. and B.S. Ooi, A study on acid reclamation and copper recovery using low pressure nanofiltration membrane. Chemical Engineering Journal. In Press, Corrected Proof.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.014

Google Scholar

[5] Aouni, A., et al., Treatment of textile wastewater by a hybrid electrocoagulation/nanofiltration process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009. 168(2-3): pp.868-874.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.112

Google Scholar

[6] Amar, N.B., et al., Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009. 170(1): pp.111-117.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.130

Google Scholar

[7] Alcaina-Miranda, M.I., et al., Nanofiltration as a final step towards textile wastewater reclamation. Desalination, 2009. 240(1-3): pp.290-297.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.02.028

Google Scholar

[8] Amy, G., Fundamental understanding of organic matter fouling of membranes. Desalination, 2008. 231(1-3): pp.44-51.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.037

Google Scholar

[9] Benítez, F.J., et al., The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009. 162(2-3): pp.1438-1445.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.036

Google Scholar

[10] Darwish, N.A., et al., Neural Networks Simulation of the Filtration of Sodium Chloride and Magnesium Chloride Solutions Using Nanofiltration Membranes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007. 85(4): pp.417-430.

DOI: 10.1205/cherd06037

Google Scholar

[11] Hong, S. and M. Elimelech, Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997. 132(2): pp.159-181.

DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(97)00060-4

Google Scholar

[12] Comerton, A.M., R.C. Andrews, and D.M. Bagley, The influence of natural organic matter and cations on fouled nanofiltration membrane effective molecular weight cut-off. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009. 327(1-2): pp.155-163.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.013

Google Scholar

[13] Patterson, D.A., et al., Membrane characterisation by SEM, TEM and ESEM: The implications of dry and wetted microstructure on mass transfer through integrally skinned polyimide nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2009. 66(1): pp.90-97.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.11.022

Google Scholar

[14] Wang, K.Y. and T. -S. Chung, Fabrication of polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for removal of chromate. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006. 281(1-2): pp.307-315.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.045

Google Scholar

[15] Comerton, A.M., R.C. Andrews, and D.M. Bagley, The influence of natural organic matter and cations on the rejection of endocrine disrupting and pharmaceutically active compounds by nanofiltration. Water Research, 2009. 43(3): pp.613-622.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.003

Google Scholar

[16] Anim-Mensah, A.R., W.B. Krantz, and R. Govind, Studies on polymeric nanofiltration-based water softening and the effect of anion properties on the softening process. European Polymer Journal, 2008. 44(7): pp.2244-2252.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.04.036

Google Scholar

[17] Bowen, W.R., et al., Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-application to an industrially relevant separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004. 242(1-2): pp.211-220.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.04.028

Google Scholar