The Impact of Assembly on the Results of Modal Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

The influence of the state of assembly and entity on modal simulation data in the computer simulation is different. In this paper, a typical modal analysis of hydraulic manipulator with the finite element method is conducted to discuss the different. The assembly is assembled by Boolean operations to makes surfaces merging together directly and then converted into the solid model. This way can ensure the validity of the comparable data. The conclusion shows that properly setting the assembly model can make the simulation results closer to the actual working conditions in the computer simulation by comparing the modal simulation data.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

896-901

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Zixing Cai. Robotics[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] Yuanmei Guo, Chong-qin Yue, etc. Based on the ANSYS workbench cylindrical grinder of the finite element analysis and optimization[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2010(1): 181-182.

Google Scholar

[3] Kunjin Zhang, Zhongcai Zheng, Yan Gao, etc. Different Gridding Influence on Finite Element Modal Analysis Results of Block[J]. Small Internal Combustion Engine And Motorcycle. 2009, 38(5): 69-71.

Google Scholar

[4] Yangxing Ou, Ken Chen, Li Liu, etc. Finite Element Analysis On The Walking Stability of The Human-robot [J]. Robot. 2003. 25(7): 716-720.

Google Scholar

[5] Jinhu Wang, Zhongcai Wang, Yan Gao, etc. Finite Element Analysis on 395 Diesel Engine Block Structure[J]. Internal Combustion Engine & Power Plant, 2013. 30(1): 29-34.

Google Scholar

[6] Qingyi Men,Guangwei Cheng. Modal Analysis of Ball Mill Rotator Based on FEM Technique[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011: 1451-1456.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.199-200.1451

Google Scholar

[7] Jun Liang, Dengfeng Zhao. Summary of the model analysis method [J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2006(8): 139-141.

Google Scholar

[8] Xu Dong, Zhongcai Zheng, Yan Gao, Zhenting Jiang, Haiyong Xiao. The study of mechanical structure for a line Inspection Robot with Double Manipulators of Antisymmetric Structure[J]. Manufacturing Automation. 2014, 36 (5): 4-6.

Google Scholar

[9] Jian Li, Zhen-ting Jiang, Xu Dong, Analysis and vibration suppression of power-on-live manipulator based on ANSYS WORKBENCH[J]. Manufacturing Automation. 2014, (1):48-51.

Google Scholar

[10] Zhen-ting Jiang, Zhong-cai Zheng , Xu Dong. Analysis and improvement of 6-DOF manipulator based on ANSYS WORKBENCH [J] Manufacturing Automation.

Google Scholar

[11] Li Cheng, Yuwang Liu, etc. Finite element modal analysis of 165kg welding robot[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2012(1), 147-149.

Google Scholar

[12] Guilong Ling, Jingbin Ding, Zheng Wen. ANSYS Workbench 13. 0: From the introduction to the master(Version 4)[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, (2013).

Google Scholar

[13] Jiankang Luo, Bo Yin. Finite element analysis and structural optimization of crane's drum[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture. 2011 (11): 185-186.

Google Scholar