A New ESO-Based Method to Find the Optimal Topology of Structures Subject to Multiple Load Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the field of topology optimization problems, the Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO) method is one of the most popular and easy to use. When dealing with problems of reasonable difficulty, the ESO method is able to give very good results in reduced times and with a limited request of computational resources. Generally, main applications of this method are addressed to the definition of the optimal topology of a component subjected to a single load condition. In this work, a new methodology, based on the ESO approach, is introduced for the study of the optimal topology of a component subjected to multiple load conditions. The new procedure, entirely developed in the APDL programming language, has been tested with a holed plate subject to two different load conditions; the obtained results are promising in terms of mass reduction and structural performances.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

902-906

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gallagher, R.H., Zienkiewics, O.C., in: Optimum Structural Design: Theory and applications, Wiley, London, (1973).

Google Scholar

[2] Bendsoe, M. P., Kikuchi, N., Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method, Comput Method Appl M, Vol. 71, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 197-224.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2

Google Scholar

[3] Ingrassia, T., Nigrelli, V., Buttitta, R., A comparison of simplex and simulated annealing for optimization of a new rear underrun protective device, (2013) Engineering with Computers, 29 (3), pp.345-358.

DOI: 10.1007/s00366-012-0270-1

Google Scholar

[4] Xie, Y. M., Steven, G. P. , A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization, Computers & Structures, Volume 49, Issue 5, 1993, Pages 885-896.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-c

Google Scholar

[5] Ingrassia, T., Nigrelli, V., Design optimization and analysis of a new rear underrun protective device for truck, (2010) Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, TMCE 2010, 2, pp.713-725.

Google Scholar

[6] Cappello, F., Mancuso, A., A genetic algorithm for combined topology and shape optimisations, Computer-Aided Design, Volume 35, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 761-769.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4485(03)00007-1

Google Scholar

[7] Ingrassia, T., Mancuso, A., Nigrelli, V., Tumino, D., Numerical study of the components positioning influence on the stability of a reverse shoulder prosthesis, (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s12008-014-0215-6

Google Scholar

[8] Ingrassia, T., Nalbone, L., Nigrelli, V., Tumino, D., Ricotta, V., Finite element analysis of two total knee joint prostheses, (2013) International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 7 (2), pp.91-101.

DOI: 10.1007/s12008-012-0167-7

Google Scholar

[9] Cerniglia, D., Ingrassia, T., D'Acquisto, L., Saporito, M., Tumino, D. Contact between the components of a knee prosthesis: Numerical and experimental study (2012) Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale, 22, pp.56-68. DOI: 10. 3221/IGF-ESIS. 22. 07.

DOI: 10.3221/igf-esis.22.07

Google Scholar

[10] Spadaro, G., Alessi, S., Dispenza, C., Sabatino, M.A., Pitarresi, G., Tumino, D., Przbytniak, G. Radiation curing of carbon fibre composites (2014) Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 94 (1), pp.14-17. DOI: 10. 1016/j. radphyschem. 2013. 05. 052.

DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.05.052

Google Scholar

[11] Tumino, D., Zuccarello, B. Fatigue delamination experiments on GFRP and CFRP specimens under single and mixed fracture modes (2011) Procedia Engineering, 10, pp.1791-1796.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.298

Google Scholar

[12] Pitarresi, G., Alessi, S., Tumino, D., Nowicki, A., Spadaro, G. Interlaminar fracture toughness behavior of electron-beam cured carbon-fiber reinforced epoxy-resin composites (2014).

DOI: 10.1002/pc.22806

Google Scholar

[13] Ingrassia, T., Alaimo, G., Cappello, F., Mancuso, A., Nigrelli, V., A new design approach to the use of composite materials for heavy transport vehicles, (2007) International Journal of Vehicle Design, 44 (3-4), pp.311-325.

DOI: 10.1504/ijvd.2007.013646

Google Scholar

[14] Bendsoe, M. P., Rodrigues, H. C., Integrated topology and boundary shape optimization of 2-D solids, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 87 (1), 1991, Pages 15-34.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90144-u

Google Scholar

[15] Yang, R.J., Chen, C.J., Stress-based topology optimization, Struct. Optim., 1996, Vol. 12, Issue 2-3, pp.98-105.

Google Scholar

[16] Maier, G., Limit design in the absence of a given layout: a finite element, zero-one programming problem, Optimum Structural Design: Theory and Applications, Wiley, pp.223-239, (1973).

Google Scholar

[17] Rodriguez, J., Seireg, A.A., Optimizing the shapes of structures via a rule-based computer program, Comput. Mech. Eng. 4, pp.20-28, (1985).

Google Scholar

[18] Atrek, E., SHAPE: a program for shape optimization of continuum structures, in Computer Aided Optimum Design of Structures: Applications, pp.135-144, (1989).

Google Scholar

[19] McKeown, J.J., A note on the equivalence between maximum stiffness and maximum strength truss, Eng. Optim., 1997. Volume 29, Issue 1-4, 1997, pp.443-456.

DOI: 10.1080/03052159708941007

Google Scholar

[20] Li, Q., Steven, G. P., Xie, Y. M., On equivalence between stress criterion and stiffness criterion in evolutionary structural Optimization, Struct. Optim., 1999. Vol. 18 (1), pp.67-73.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01210693

Google Scholar