Analysis of the Masonry Structure Calculation with Vertical Ring Beams According to European Standards

Article Preview

Abstract:

Analysis of masonry constructions is done simultaneously by applying the Rules on technical standards for masonry walls (PZZ'81), Regulation on technical standards for the constructions in seismic areas (PIOVS'91) and Eurocodes (EC 6 and EC 8). Eurocode presupposes shear force to be a reliable mechanism form calculating shear wall resistance force, which conflicts to the real behavior of constructions during earthquakes. It is therefore recommended determining the seismic masonry resistance according to the current rules that require verification tensile strain, whose possible exceeding leads to the appearance diagonal wall cracks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

111-117

Citation:

Online since:

January 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Evrokod 6. EN 1996-1-1: (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Evrokod 8. EN 1998-1: (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] Regulation on technical norms for masonry walls (Fig. SFRY,. No. 87/9) and the following standards JUS.

Google Scholar

[4] Regulation on technical norms for the construction of buildings in seismic areas (Fig. SFRY, No 31/81, 49/82, 29/83, 21/88 and 52/90. ).

Google Scholar

[5] Tomažević, M. Introducing Eurocodes and the calculation of seismic resistance of the masonry constructions (2008) Ljubljana 263 p.

Google Scholar

[6] Zejak, D. Uporedna analiza zidane konstrukcije sa vertikalnim serklažima prema važećim i evropskim propisima (2012) Specijalistički rad, Građevinski fakultet Univerziteta u Podgorici.

Google Scholar

[7] Information on: http: /www. wbalkanseismicmaps. org/index. php/seismic-hazard-maps.

Google Scholar

[8] Mrdak, I., Rakočević, M., Žugić, L., Usmanov, R., Murgul, V., Vatin, N. Analysis of the influence of dynamic properties of structures on seismic response according to Montenegrin and European regulations. (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.633-634.1069

Google Scholar

[9] Kovačič, B., Kamnik, R., Kapović, Z. Mathematical analysis of measured displacements with emphasis on polynomial interpolation (2009) Geodetski List, 63 (4), pp.315-327.

Google Scholar

[10] Brcic, S., Zugic-Zornija, Lj. Seismic response of two adjacent non-symmetric multistory buildings (1998) International Conference on Structures Under Shock and Impact, SUSI, pp.375-384.

Google Scholar

[11] Kovačič, B., Kamnik, R., Premrov, M. Deformation measurement of a structure with calculation of intermediate load phases (2011) Survey Review, 43 (320), pp.150-161.

DOI: 10.1179/003962611x12894696204902

Google Scholar

[12] Kovačič, B., Kamnik, R., Premrov, M., Gubeljak, N., Predan, J., Tišma, Z. Modern deformation measurement techniques and their comparison (2008) Strojniski Vestnik / Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 54 (5), pp.364-371.

Google Scholar

[13] Ber, B., Premrov, M., Strukelj, A., Sustersic, I., Dujic, B. Static and dynamic testing of timber-glass composite wall panels (2014).

DOI: 10.1201/b16499-34

Google Scholar

[14] Premrov, M., Dujic, B., Ber, B. Glazing influence on the seismic resistance of prefabricated timber-framed buildings (2013).

Google Scholar

[15] Jancar, J., Dujic, B., Premrov, M. Seismic response of buildings upgraded with the X-LAM timber superstructure (2012) World Conference on Timber Engineering 2012, WCTE 2012, 1, pp.504-510.

Google Scholar

[16] Premrov, M., Dobrila, P. Influence of carbon fibre-reinforced polymers reinforcing on the seismic behaviour of timber-framed walls with fibre-plaster sheathing boards (2009) WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 104, pp.409-418.

DOI: 10.2495/eres090371

Google Scholar