Behaviour of Composite Column of Cold-Formed Steel Section without Web Stiffener Integrated with Ferrocement Jacket

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cold-formed steel (CFS) is known to be a thin section. Thus it is considered a weak slender steel section which limits the compression capacity of the column. The aim of this study was to determine the ultimate capacity of built-up lipped CFS (assembled with ferrocement jacket) as composite column (CFFCC) under axial compression load. Nine specimens of composite columns were prepared and tested. The main parameters that varied in the CFFCC columns were column height, cold-formed steel thickness, and influence of ferrocement jacket. There were are three different heights of the CFFCC composite column namely 2000mm, 3000mm and 4000mm used in this study. All CFFCC columns were tested under axial load by a thick steel plate. The results indicated that ferrocement jacket provided sufficient lateral support to the column web and significantly increased both the strength and ductility of the specimens under axial loading. The strength capacity of CFFCC improved significantly, about 149% greater than that of bare steel column section. It was also found that the axial load capacity of CFS-ferrocement jacket composite columns (CFFCC) had increased significantly (in the range of 20% to 40%) as thickness of CFS increased.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

528-532

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.S. Saadon, Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of PVC Concrete composite Columns, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Basrah (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] K.F. Sarsam, I.A. Al-Shaarbaf and M.S. Shuber, Behavior of Short Reinforced Porcelinite Concrete Columns Under Concentric Loads, Eng. Tech. J. 27(2009) 1219-1234.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Wei-Wen, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, Cold-Formed Steel Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] B.C. Gourley, C. Tort, J.F. Hajjar and P.H. Schiller, A synopsis of studies of the monotonic and cyclic behaviour of concrete filled steel tube beam-columns, Structural Engineering Report No. ST-01-4. Minneapolis, Minnesota Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Technology, University of Minnesota, 55455, (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] B.W. Schafer, Distortional Buckling of Cold-Formed Steel Columns, Final Report to the American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D. C, (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] P. Rathish Kumar, T. Oshima, S.H. Mikami and T. Yamazaki, Studies on RC and Ferrocement Jacketed Columns Subjected to Simulated Seismic Loading, Asian J. Civ. Eng. Build. Hou, 2 (2007) 215-255.

Google Scholar

[7] A.H.M.M. Billah, Seismic performance evaluation of multi column bridge bent retrofitted with different alternative, Okanagan, The University of British Columbia. Master of applied science: 176, (2011).

Google Scholar

[8] S. EFNARC, Guidelines for self-compacting concrete, London, UK: Association House, (2002) 32-34.

Google Scholar

[9] ANSI, A. AISC 360-05, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction. Inc: Chicago, IL, (2005).

Google Scholar