OpenLabs - Collaborative Industrialization with Distributed and Open Source Microfactories

Article Preview

Abstract:

Technical progress in production technology, the advancement of ICTs as well as increasing social and economic imbalances and ever-scarce resources ask for new means of value creation. . With the spill over of the highly efficient and innovative open source principles to the world of physical goods and products new modes of value creation appear that put traditional economic strategies and assumptions into question by stressing collaboration instead of competition, knowledge sharing engineering and fostering the empowerment of the people to participate and get engaged.The here presented multidisciplinary OpenLabs concept takes into account these new patterns of value creation based on open source principles and is a suitable approach to increase the overall empowerment and participation in local communities in developing, but also in developed countries.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

470-477

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.M. Pearce, The case for open source appropriate technology, Environment, Development and Sustainability 14 (3) (2012), 425.

Google Scholar

[2] H. -P. Götting, H. Röder-Hitschke, Grundlagen des Patentrechts in: M. Schulte (Ed. ), Handbuch des Technikrechts. Allgemeine Grundlagen, Umweltrecht, Gentechnikrecht, Energierecht, Telekommunikations- und Medienrecht, Patentrecht, Computerrecht, 2nd Ed., Springer, Berlin, 2011, 722.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11884-5_15

Google Scholar

[3] M. Boldrin, D. K. Levine, Against intellectual monopoly, Cambridge University Press, New York, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Powell, Democratizing Production through Open Source Knowledge: From Open Software to Open Hardware, Media Culture Society, 6 (34), (2012), pp.691-708.

DOI: 10.1177/0163443712449497

Google Scholar

[5] T. Redlich, J. P. Wulfsberg, F. L. Bruhns, Open production: scientific foundation for co-creative product realisation, Prod Eng Res Devel 5(2), (2011), pp.127-139.

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-010-0286-6

Google Scholar

[6] J. Ginger, R. McGrath, B. Barrett, V. McCreary, Mini Labs. Building Capacity for Innovation through a local FabLab Network, World Fab Conference (2012).

Google Scholar

[7] T. Campbell, C. Williams, O. Ivanova, B. Garrett, Could 3D Printing Change the World, Atlantic Council, Strategic Foresight Report, October (2011).

Google Scholar

[8] C. K. Prahalad, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits, Revised and Updated 5th Anniversary Edition, Prentice Hall, (2011).

Google Scholar

[9] T. Redlich, Wertschöpfung in der Bottom-up Ökonomie, Springer, Heidelberg, (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Michel, S. L. Vargo, R. F. Lusch, Reconfiguration of the Conceptual Landscape: A Tribute to the Service Logic of Richard Normann, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (2008), p.152–155.

DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0067-8

Google Scholar

[11] G. von Krogh, Open-Source Software Development, MIT Sloan Management Review, (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, Understanding open source software development, Addison-Wesley, London, (2002).

Google Scholar

[13] A. Bonaccorsi, C. Rossi, Why open source software can succeed, Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp.1243-1258.

DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00051-9

Google Scholar

[14] B. Kogut, A. Metiu, Open-source software development and distributed innovation, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17 (2) (2001), pp.248-264.

DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/17.2.248

Google Scholar

[15] RepRap project, information on: http: /reprap. org/, from 26 April (2015).

Google Scholar

[16] MakerBot, information on: http: /de. wikipedia. org/wiki/MakerBot#cite_note-4, from 26 April (2015).

Google Scholar

[17] Tesla Motors, information on: http: /www. teslamotors. com/blog/allour-patent-are-belong-you, from from 26 April (2015).

Google Scholar

[18] Toyota, information on: http: /corporatenews. pressroom. toyota. com/releases/toyota+fu el+cell+patents+ces+2015. htm, from 26 April (2015).

Google Scholar

[19] Local Motors, information on: http: /de. slideshare. net/johnbrogersjr/local-motors-johnrogers-maker-con-2014-140918?related=1, from 26 April (2015).

Google Scholar

[20] Open Source Ecology, information on: http: /opensourceecology. org/, from 19 January (2015).

Google Scholar

[21] C. C. Thomson, M. Jakubowski, Toward an Open Source Civilisation, Innovations, 7(3) (2012).

Google Scholar

[22] M. Boldrin, D. K. Levine, The Case Against Intellectual Monopoly, FRB of St. Louis, Working Paper No. 2012-035A.

Google Scholar

[23] M. Boldrin, D. K. Levine, Perfectly competitive innovation, Journal of Monetary Economics, (2008).

Google Scholar

[24] N. Gershenfeld, Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop, From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication, Basic Books, Cambridge, (2005).

Google Scholar

[25] J. M. Pearce, C. M. Blair, K. J. Laciak, R. Andrews, 3-D printing of open source appropriate technologies for selfdirected sustainable development, Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(4) (2010).

DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v3n4p17

Google Scholar

[26] C. Raasch, C. Herstatt, K. Balka, On the open design of tangible goods, Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., Chesbrough H. (eds. ): R&D Management - Special Issue: Open R&D and Open Innovation, 9(4) (2009), p.382–393.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00567.x

Google Scholar

[27] J. Ackermann, Toward Open Source Hardware, University of Dayton Law Review, 34 (2) (2009).

Google Scholar

[28] B. Röhlig, Theory of Small Machine Tools: A Framework Approach to Machine Development, Adv. Materials Research, 769 (2013), pp.293-300.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.769.293

Google Scholar

[29] J. P. Wulfsberg, B. Röhlig, Paradigm change: Small machine tools for small workpieces, Production Engineering, (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-013-0457-3

Google Scholar

[30] J. P. Wulfsberg, A. Verl, K. H. Wurst, S. Grimske, C. Batke, T. Heinze, Modularity in small machine tools, Production Engineering, 7(5) (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-013-0464-4

Google Scholar

[31] S. Grimske, Multifunktionale Schnittstellen für kleine modulare Werkzeugmaschinen, Hamburg, Dissertation Shaker Verlag, Band 34, (2014).

Google Scholar