Production Planning and Control in Complex, Autonomous Systems – Acceptance by the Planner as Factor of Success for the Cooperation with such Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

The manufacturing of so called customer innovated products leads to changes in production planning and control. In order to master the complexity inherent to a production with batch size one, the use of autonomous systems is a possible solution. The implementation of such systems may involve problems concerning the acceptance of users, for example production planners, as they are complex to understand and to work with. The following article analyses this problem and points out the importance of a defined process and an appropriate interface between human and system to realise a successful interaction. In addition to that, an approach for the definition of requirements for this cooperation is introduced.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

453-460

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. Schuh, M. Lenders, C. Nussbaum, D. Kupke, Design for Changeability, in: H.A. ElMaraghy (Ed. ), Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Springer, Berlin, 2009, pp.251-266.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-067-8_14

Google Scholar

[2] E. Abele, G. Reinhart, Zukunft der Produktion – Herausforderungen, Forschungsfelder, Chancen, Hanser, München, (2011).

DOI: 10.3139/9783446428058

Google Scholar

[3] T. Bauernhansl, Industrie 4. 0, wt Werkstatttechnik online 3 (2015) 78.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Bauernhansl, M. ten Hompel, B. Vogel-Heuser, Industrie 4. 0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik, Springer, Berlin, (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45537-1

Google Scholar

[5] B. Scholz-Reiter, C. de Beer, M. Freitag, T. Hamann, H. Rekersbrink, J.T. Tervo, Dynamik logistischer Systeme, in: S.B. Miles et al. (Eds. ), Beiträge zu einer Theorie der Logistik, Springer, Berlin, 2008, pp.109-138.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75642-2_6

Google Scholar

[6] V. Marik, D. McFarlane, Industrial Adoption of Agent-Based Technologies, IEEE Intelligent Systems 20 (2005) V. 1, 27-35.

DOI: 10.1109/mis.2005.11

Google Scholar

[7] W. Li, Y. Tu, Adaptive Production Scheduling and Control in One-Of-A-Kind Production, in: R. Righi (Ed. ), Production Scheduling, InTech, 2012, pp.113-138.

DOI: 10.5772/26771

Google Scholar

[8] U. Teschemacher, A. Hees, G. Reinhart, Produktionsorganisation für die Herstellung kundeninnovierter Produkte, Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikvertrieb 109 (2014) 16-19.

DOI: 10.3139/104.111097

Google Scholar

[9] L. Marsh, C. Onof, Stigmergic epistemology, stigmergic cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 9 (2009) 1-2, 136-149.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.009

Google Scholar

[10] U. Bochum, Gewerkschaftliche Positionen in Bezug auf Industrie 4. 0, in: A. Botthof, E.A. Hartmann (Eds. ), Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4. 0, Springer, Berlin, 2015, pp.31-44.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45915-7_4

Google Scholar

[11] M. Veigt, F. Ganji, E.M. Kluge, B. Scholz-Reiter, Autonomous Control in Production Planning and Control: How to Integrate Autonomous Control into Existing Production and Control Structures, in: M. Hülsmann, B. Scholz-Reiter, K. Windt (Eds. ), Autonomous Cooperation and Control in Logistics, Springer, Berlin, 2011, pp.313-329.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19469-6_22

Google Scholar

[12] G. Grote, Menschliche Kontrolle über technische Systeme – Ein irreführendes Postulat, in K. Karrer, B. Gauss & C. Steffens (Eds. ), Beiträge der Forschung zur Mensch-Maschine-Systemtechnik aus Forschung und Praxis, Symposium, Düsseldorf, 2005, pp.65-78.

Google Scholar

[13] W. Dorst, Fabrik- und Produktionsprozesse der Industrie 4. 0 im Jahr 2020, IM Information Management and Consulting 3 (2012) 34-37.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Reinecke, Gute Arbeit in der Industrie 4. 0 – aus Sicht der Landtechnik, in: A. Botthof, E.A. Hartmann (Eds. ), Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4. 0, Springer, Berlin, 2015, pp.65-68.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45915-7_7

Google Scholar

[15] R. Weidner, T. Redlich, J.P. Wulfsberg, Technik, die die Menschen wollen, in: Proceedings Erste Transdisziplinäre Konferenz zum Thema Technische Unterstützungssysteme, die die Menschen wirklich wollen, (2014) 1-8.

Google Scholar

[16] Information on http: /research. google. com/university/relations/facultysummit2011/, Google Tech Talks, Self-Driving Car, presented by Andrew Chatham, on 15. 04. (2015).

Google Scholar

[17] E. Fraedrich, B. Lenz, Automated driving – Individual and societal aspects entering the debate, submitted to TRB 93rd Annual Meeting, (2013).

Google Scholar